2005
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200509000-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angle Stable Locking Reduces Interfragmentary Movements and Promotes Healing After Unreamed Nailing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Micro-motions are caused by instability which is difficult to eliminate in fixation systems that rely on standard interlocking nails (von Pfeil et al 2005, Dejardin et al 2006. The work of Kaspar (Kaspar et al 2005) seems to corroborate the above findings. Functional weight bearing accelerates bone healing and it strengthens newly formed callus tissue (Sarmiento et al 1977, O'Sullivan et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Micro-motions are caused by instability which is difficult to eliminate in fixation systems that rely on standard interlocking nails (von Pfeil et al 2005, Dejardin et al 2006. The work of Kaspar (Kaspar et al 2005) seems to corroborate the above findings. Functional weight bearing accelerates bone healing and it strengthens newly formed callus tissue (Sarmiento et al 1977, O'Sullivan et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…This fatigue stress to screws may cause failure or produce metal splinters on their surface. [8,25,28] In our series, we used our newly designed unreamed IM nail and allowed FWB the day after surgery. We had no implant failure even in unstable and distal tibia fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following protocols developed by other investigators (Augat et al, 2008, Epari et al, 2007, Kaspar et al, 2005, Penzkofer et al, 2009 and applied by ourselves previously for characterisation of tibial IM nailing stability , Dailey et al, 2013, we carried out testing in axial tension/compression, anteroposterior ( …”
Section: Biomechanical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The speed of this healing process is influenced by the magnitude and direction of the interfragmentary motion (IFM) allowed within the fracture site. Factors that are known to influence IFM include weight bearing, nail diameter, number and orientation of locking screws used, and specialised implant design features such as angular-stable locking, compression locking, and controlled axial micromotion (Brown, Bryan, & Stevens, 2007, Dailey et al, 2013, Kaspar et al, 2005. Less attention, however, has been given to the role of the fibula in tibial IFM after IM nailing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%