2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.102.033112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angle-resolved time delays for shake-up ionization of helium

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 8)), can be written in terms of a Fourier series in the relative phase φ. The emission signal takes the form [51] S…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…( 8)), can be written in terms of a Fourier series in the relative phase φ. The emission signal takes the form [51] S…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the leading term (i = 1) provides the information of the relative ionization phase δ 1 (E) = δ(E) in analogy to the RABBIT protocol [51]. Higher-order Fourier components c i (E) for {i = 2, 3...} should provide an error estimate of the fit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly, similar situations occur in the shakeup ionization channel of the helium atom. [80] If the target is a heavier rare gas atom where the ionizing shell is np, the EWS time delay itself also becomes angular dependent. [81,82] In addition, near the Fano resonance of Ar, a strong anisotropic photoionization delay has been found.…”
Section: Recent Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently linear scaling with Nt$$ {N}_t $$ has become feasible within the G1–G2 scheme, [ 13,14 ] which could be demonstrated even for advanced self‐energy approximations like normalGW$$ \mathrm{GW} $$ and the particle–particle and particle–hole T ‐matrix approximations. Moreover, the full nonequilibrium version of the dynamically screened ladder approximation could be implemented, for lattice models, [ 15,16 ] for details of the scheme, see Reference [17]. The advantage of the linear scaling in the G1–G2 scheme comes with a cost: the simultaneous propagation of the time‐diagonal single‐particle and correlated two‐particle Green functions, G1(t)$$ {G}_1(t) $$ and G2(t)$$ {\mathcal{G}}_2(t) $$, demands a substantial computational effort for computing and storing all matrix elements of G2$$ {\mathcal{G}}_2 $$.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%