2016 24th Signal Processing and Communication Application Conference (SIU) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/siu.2016.7496018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angle of arrival (AoA) estimation by using software defined radios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The signal was then filtered using a Gaussian Fourier filter to locate the initial angle calculation using the 𝜃 𝐹𝐹𝑇 equation ( 14). Once the 𝜃 𝐹𝐹𝑇 angle was determined, the 𝜃 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙 value was calculated using equation (22), which reduced the scanning range for the MUSIC algorithm and resulted in a faster calculation time. The results of the experiments conducted in a controlled environment with an average SNR ratio of 10 dB were presented in Table 5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The signal was then filtered using a Gaussian Fourier filter to locate the initial angle calculation using the 𝜃 𝐹𝐹𝑇 equation ( 14). Once the 𝜃 𝐹𝐹𝑇 angle was determined, the 𝜃 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙 value was calculated using equation (22), which reduced the scanning range for the MUSIC algorithm and resulted in a faster calculation time. The results of the experiments conducted in a controlled environment with an average SNR ratio of 10 dB were presented in Table 5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) was utilized as a metric for evaluating the accuracy of the estimated phase and AOA in this study. This was done by comparing the estimated values to the true values using the following equation (22) and analyzing the results for various SNR and angle changes [29], [30].…”
Section: Music Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, two USRPs were used to estimate the direction of the signal source in [9][10][11]. e angle estimation error in [9] is about 3 °.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, two USRPs were used to estimate the direction of the signal source in [9][10][11]. e angle estimation error in [9] is about 3 °. e system in [10] has an RMS error of 2.14 °and 2.49 °when estimating one source and two sources, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%