Legal remedies for judicial review without being preceded by ordinary legal remedies are a phenomenon that is often and increasingly occurring in Indonesia's justice world. It phenomenon occurs in order to take advantage of legal loopholes. The convict immediately submits a legal remedy for judicial review because, in legal proceedings for judicial review, there is a principle that the sentence imposed must not exceed the original decision. Material justice and truth become a discourse on the application of extraordinary legal remedies for judicial review, thus whether the provisions of Article 263 of the Criminal Procedure Code can be applied to court decisions that have obtained permanent legal force without going through appeals and cassation. This study aims to find out the substance of criminal law arrangements in Indonesia related to judicial review. The research method used is normative legal research, namely research conducted by the author using laws and a conceptual approach, legal material collection techniques using library research, then legal material obtained from library research is analyzed qualitatively. The research results obtained are Judicial Review in principle, an extraordinary remedy for court decisions with permanent legal force (inkracht van gewisjde), aims to provide legal certainty and is formed to address the interests of the convict, not the interests of the state or the victim. Judicial review is regulated in Law no. 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Code ("KUHAP") with articles including: Article 263, Article 264, Article 265, Article 266, Article 267, Article 268, Article 269.