2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in COVID-19: Meta-analysis/Meta-regression Adjusted for Confounding Factors

Abstract: BACKGROUND Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and/or angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors could alter mortality of COVID-19, but existing meta-analyses which combined crude and adjusted results may be confounded by comorbidities being more common in ARBs/ACE inhibitors users. METHODS We searched PubMed/MEDLINE/Embase for cohort studies and meta-analysis reporting mortality by pre-existing ARB/ACE inhibitor treatment in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Random … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This study was not the first systematic review and meta‐analysis to assess the associations between RAAS inhibitor use and COVID‐19 outcomes. As of December 2021, at least 52 meta‐analyses had been conducted, 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 each of which pooled studies that have a critical risk of bias. Critical biases limit confidence in the evidence produced by these meta‐analyses as much as they do in each of the studies that t...…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study was not the first systematic review and meta‐analysis to assess the associations between RAAS inhibitor use and COVID‐19 outcomes. As of December 2021, at least 52 meta‐analyses had been conducted, 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 each of which pooled studies that have a critical risk of bias. Critical biases limit confidence in the evidence produced by these meta‐analyses as much as they do in each of the studies that t...…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 6 At least 52 meta‐analyses have assessed associations between RAAS inhibitor use and COVID‐19 risk by collating parts of that body of research. 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 However, little attention has been paid to selection bias, or other biases for that matter, which may distort the interaction between RAAS inhibitor use and COVID‐19.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comorbidities such as HF and coronary artery disease express elevated levels of ACE2, thus leading to an increased susceptibility and disease severity in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Also, the binding of the virus to ACE2 receptors determines endothelial dysfunction through hyperinflammation, elevated plasma levels of prothrombin, and as a consequence the risk of arterial and venous thrombosis increases (46)(47)(48).…”
Section: Aldosteronementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a meta-regression analyses shows that ARBs/ACEi use, correlates with a significant drop in mortality in COVID-19 patients, after sex, age, cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure and chronic kidney disease adjusting. Moreover, treatment management of COVID-19 patients from current guidelines also recommend continuation with these pharmacological agents in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities (46).…”
Section: Aldosteronementioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Por último, en un análisis de metarregresión realizado entre 30 estudios, el uso de iECA o ARA II se asoció con una disminución significativa de la mortalidad en pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 después de controlar los posibles factores de confusión al nivel del estudio durante la síntesis de datos (OR de 0.77 con IC del 95% de 0.62 -0.96), sin dicho ajuste el resultado no obtuvo significancia estadística (OR de 0.87 con IC del 95% de 0.71 -1.08). 23 Reconocemos como limitaciones del presente estudio que los pacientes procedían de hospitales de cuarto nivel de atención, lo que puede inducir a un sesgo de selección al tratarse de casos con una severidad mayor de base. Las variables fueron evaluadas solo al momento de su ingreso a hospitalización lo que podría tener implicaciones en el desempeño presentado.…”
Section: N T Ro D U C C I ó N M E To D O L O G í Aunclassified