1984
DOI: 10.1016/0008-8749(84)90196-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angiotensin II stimulation of granuloma macrophage phagocytesis and actin polymerization in murine schistosomiasis mansoni

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While most of the known physiological and pathophysiological actions of Ang II (hemodynamics, aldosterone release, growth of vascular cells) have been attributed to the AT 1 receptor, the role of the AT 2 subtype is less clear (48). We document the presence of Ang II AT 1 receptors on MPM and the J-774 cell line with an apparent K d of 0.18 and 0.50 nM, respectively, which is in agreement with studies on macrophages isolated from murine liver granulomas following Schistosoma mansoni infection (49). The fact that only an AT 1 receptor antagonist was able to compete for the Ang II binding on MPM and J-774, suggests that AT 1 -binding sites are present and that binding of Ang II to its receptor is required for the Ang II-induced effects.…”
Section: Gapdhsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…While most of the known physiological and pathophysiological actions of Ang II (hemodynamics, aldosterone release, growth of vascular cells) have been attributed to the AT 1 receptor, the role of the AT 2 subtype is less clear (48). We document the presence of Ang II AT 1 receptors on MPM and the J-774 cell line with an apparent K d of 0.18 and 0.50 nM, respectively, which is in agreement with studies on macrophages isolated from murine liver granulomas following Schistosoma mansoni infection (49). The fact that only an AT 1 receptor antagonist was able to compete for the Ang II binding on MPM and J-774, suggests that AT 1 -binding sites are present and that binding of Ang II to its receptor is required for the Ang II-induced effects.…”
Section: Gapdhsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Moreover, it has been reported that ANG II activates M/M under certain circumstances (54,55). In our experiments, ANG II alone was not chemotactic for human monocytes and the chemotactic activity of conditioned supernatants from ANG II-treated GER was abolished in the presence of the neutralizing anti-RANTES antibody, strongly indicating that induction of RANTES is necessary, and ANG II per se is not chemotactic for monocytes in our experimental setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to effects on vascular tone and smooth muscle growth, microvascular angiotensin receptors may regulate endothelial permeability (Morel et al, 1990) and neovascularisation (Fernandez et al, 1985;Le Noble et al, 1991 (Thomas & Hoffman, 1994) and fibroblasts (Millan et al, 1989) have previously been shown to express angiotensin receptors in culture. In vitro, angiotensin inhibits macrophage migration (Weinstock & Blum, 1983) and may increase phagocytosis (Weinstock & Kassab, 1984), although the relevance of these observations to macrophage function in vivo remains uncertain. Angiotensin receptor subtypes have been extensively studied in foetal rat skin fibroblasts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%