1997
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.5914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angiotensin II Stimulates the Proliferation of Osteoblast-Rich Populations of Cells from Rat Calvariae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

6
53
0
12

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
53
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…A mechanism that could partially explain our histometric results may also be attributed to the influence of angiotensin II on bone cells. Although the effect of angiotensin II on osteoblastic cells is still controversial and predominantly based on in vitro studies, [23][24][25] there is some evidence to suggest that this mediator is a potent suppressor of the differentiation of osteoblastic cells and, consequently, of the bone formation by these cells. 22 Our findings are contradictory to those described by Pereira et al (2007), 15 in which the amount of newly-formed bone was similar in SHR and NTR animals at 7 days and higher in SHR at 21 days post-operative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mechanism that could partially explain our histometric results may also be attributed to the influence of angiotensin II on bone cells. Although the effect of angiotensin II on osteoblastic cells is still controversial and predominantly based on in vitro studies, [23][24][25] there is some evidence to suggest that this mediator is a potent suppressor of the differentiation of osteoblastic cells and, consequently, of the bone formation by these cells. 22 Our findings are contradictory to those described by Pereira et al (2007), 15 in which the amount of newly-formed bone was similar in SHR and NTR animals at 7 days and higher in SHR at 21 days post-operative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ang II stimulates proliferation and decreases the ALP activity of rat calvarial cells. [33][34][35] These effects were antagonized by AT1 antagonist, indicating that the effect of Ang II was mediated through AT1 receptors. Therefore, it is conceivable that agents that interfere RAS might affect bone metabolism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33][34][35] Since AT1 antagonists disturb the signaling of Ang II by inhibiting its binding to the AT1 receptor, it is expected that these drugs may have a similar effect to ACE inhibitors on bone metabolism in vivo. In our study, AT1 antagonists TCV-116 and KW-3433 did not change either ALP activity or DNA content of MC3T3-E1, implying that these classes of drugs have no direct effect on osteoblast differentiation and proliferation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Renin angiotensin system (RAS) is operating not only systemically but also locally in several tissues, and bone microenvironments have been studied in this regard (15,16). Osteoblasts and osteoclasts express angiotensin II type 1 receptor in cell cultures (17)(18)(19), suggesting the existence of local RAS in bone. However, whether RAS components are expressed in bone in vivo is not known.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%