1996
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140012004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angiofibroma: Changes in Staging and Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
270
1
18

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 339 publications
(295 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
270
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of the tumor was determined on angiography by the hypervascular blush. The maximum anteroposterior, transverse, and cranial caudal dimensions of each tumor are shown in the Table. The staging systems of Fisch 9 and Radkowski et al 10 were assessed by preoperative cross-sectional MR imaging. The approach and number of needles placed into the tumor, embolization time, operative time, surgical approach, blood transfusion requirement, and estimated blood loss from surgical excision were recorded from retrospective review of medical records.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of the tumor was determined on angiography by the hypervascular blush. The maximum anteroposterior, transverse, and cranial caudal dimensions of each tumor are shown in the Table. The staging systems of Fisch 9 and Radkowski et al 10 were assessed by preoperative cross-sectional MR imaging. The approach and number of needles placed into the tumor, embolization time, operative time, surgical approach, blood transfusion requirement, and estimated blood loss from surgical excision were recorded from retrospective review of medical records.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumours were staged as per the Radkowski et al system. 25 Thirty-eight cases of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma were detected. Tumours limited to the nose, nasopharynx, sphenoid sinus and pterygopalatine fossa, and those with limited infratemporal fossa extension, were included for endoscopic exposure and excision.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…External approaches are inferiorly-via a trans-palatal route; laterally via a transtemporal or infratemporal route; anteriorly via a maxillary swing approach [3,15]. These approaches have limited access and considerable post op morbidity due to extensive and complex mobilization [12,14,15]. Transnasal endoscopic resection of nasopharyngeal tumours obviates the need for extensive soft tissue and bony mobilization [2,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%