1989
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320320235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angelman and Prader‐Willi syndromes share a common chromosome 15 deletion but differ in parental origin of the deletion

Abstract: Many Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) patients have a cytogenetic deletion of 15q11q13. While AS and PWS share a similar cytogenetic anomaly, they have very different clinical phenotypes. DNAs from 4 AS patients were examined using 5 chromosome 15q11q13-specific cloned DNA segments. With the present level of resolution, the molecular deletions between AS and those previously reported for PWS did not appear to differ. However, in contrast to the paternal inheritance of the deleted chromoso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
240
2
6

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 518 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
240
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It was initially proposed that Angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes resulted from deletions of different points along the long arm of chromosome 15 (Magenis et al, 1987). In 1989, however it was observed that the deletion of 15q11-13, which resulted in Angelman syndrome, was on the chromosome 15 that had been inherited from the mother and in Prader-Willi syndrome the deletion was derived from the father (Knoll, Nicholls, Magenis, Graham, Lalande & Latt, 1989). These two syndromes then provided a human model for genomic imprinting, where genetic information is expressed differently depending on the parent of origin (Clayton-Smith, 1992).…”
Section: Prevalence and Genetic Disordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was initially proposed that Angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes resulted from deletions of different points along the long arm of chromosome 15 (Magenis et al, 1987). In 1989, however it was observed that the deletion of 15q11-13, which resulted in Angelman syndrome, was on the chromosome 15 that had been inherited from the mother and in Prader-Willi syndrome the deletion was derived from the father (Knoll, Nicholls, Magenis, Graham, Lalande & Latt, 1989). These two syndromes then provided a human model for genomic imprinting, where genetic information is expressed differently depending on the parent of origin (Clayton-Smith, 1992).…”
Section: Prevalence and Genetic Disordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Most deletions occur de novo and are of maternal origin, in contrast to the 15q11-13 deletions observed in Prader-Willi syndrome which are of paternal origin. 27 The common deletion can be detected by FISH analysis and by methylation analysis of the SNRPN (small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide N) promoter which lies within a CpG island at 15q11-13. In the presence of a maternal deletion only the paternal, unmethylated pattern will be detectable.…”
Section: Genetics Of Angelman Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, some imprinted genes play a decisive role in growth control and developmental processes. 6 The disruption of these genes causes severe genetic syndromes including Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS [MIM: 176270]), Angelman syndrome (AS [MIM: 105830]), [7][8][9] Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS [MIM: 130650]), [10][11][12] Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS [MIM: 180860]), 13,14 Temple syndrome (TS14 [MIM: 616222]), and Kagami-Ogata syndrome (KOS14 [MIM: 608149]). 15 In the early 1990s, Igf2 (paternally expressed) and H19 (maternally expressed) were the first two imprinted genes to be discovered in mice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%