2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ANFIS modelling of mean gap voltage variation to predict wire breakages during wire EDM of Inconel 718

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 (d)). Similar pulse cycle trends are observed in the recent literature during condition monitoring of wire EDM [35][36][37].…”
Section: Wire Breakagessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…14 (d)). Similar pulse cycle trends are observed in the recent literature during condition monitoring of wire EDM [35][36][37].…”
Section: Wire Breakagessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Such models will thus be less accurate in predicting wire breakages. Abhilash and chakradhar (2020a) has developed an adaptive neurofuzzy inference system (ANFIS) powered decision support system to predict wire breakages. The prediction is based on a threshold value of mean gap voltage variation above which the wire breakage was experimentally observed.…”
Section: Wire Break Prediction Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Due to their inherent ability to model high dimensional data with non-linearity, machine learning approaches have been highly successful in matching WEDM process outputs with input attributes. 2936 The literature presented in the preceding paragraphs suggests that there are plenty of reports available to indicate the correlation of geometrical inaccuracies with the input parameters such as pulse on time ( T on ), pulse off time ( T off ), and pulse peak current ( I p ). Hence, the goal of this research is to see how random fluctuations in process variables like servo voltage (SV), servo feed rate (SF), dielectric water pressure (WP), and wire tension (WT) affect two geometric responses: corner error (CE) and undercut (UC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%