2002
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.72.3.334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: outcomes of early rehabilitation after surgical repair of ruptured intracranial aneurysms

Abstract: Objectives: The aim was to analyse functional and cognitive outcomes in patients receiving early rehabilitation treatment after surgery for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Methods: The assessment protocol included all relevant clinical data, the Hunt-Hess scale, the functional independence measure (FIM), and the mini mental state examination (MMSE). Results: Of 59 patients included in the study, 52.5% (31) were men and 47.5% (28) were women. The patients' average age was 52 years, and 57.6% were emp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing studies still lack consensus concerning which disease factors are the most influential for cognitive dysfunction after SAH and makes predictions in the present study open. Heterogeneous results are probably due to the large number of possible pre-, peri-, and post-operative factors that may influence the brain and recovery of cognitive functioning [3,10,13,23,26,30,36,37,39,[42][43][44]. Differences in methodology between cognitive studies may also produce heterogeneous results such as differences in test batteries applied for assessment of cognitive functions, small sample sizes and intra-sample heterogeneity [1,26,27,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing studies still lack consensus concerning which disease factors are the most influential for cognitive dysfunction after SAH and makes predictions in the present study open. Heterogeneous results are probably due to the large number of possible pre-, peri-, and post-operative factors that may influence the brain and recovery of cognitive functioning [3,10,13,23,26,30,36,37,39,[42][43][44]. Differences in methodology between cognitive studies may also produce heterogeneous results such as differences in test batteries applied for assessment of cognitive functions, small sample sizes and intra-sample heterogeneity [1,26,27,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It has become well recognized that patients surgically treated for SAH often struggle with persisting cognitive impairments despite being neurologically intact [4,7,9,10,13,17,23,30,36,37,39,43]. Knowledge of the disease factors that influence long-term cognitive outcome after SAH is clinically important as such factors are possibly modifi-■ Abstract Objective To assess predictors for cognitive impairment one year after spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, work-disabled individuals with other longterm conditions, for example rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis, have been shown to suffer increased depression and reduced QoL (13,14). However, individuals who return to work after stroke report significantly higher subjective well-being and life satisfaction and fewer unmet needs (20,21). Although for some brain injury survivors return to work may be unrealistic, it is reasonable to assume that the majority of those in work at the time of their injury will want to go back to work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might impact referral patterns to rehabilitation, especially in patients with good outcome using the mRS and GOS. The detection of cognitive deficits and referral to specialized therapy has the potential to provide benefit to a large group of patients [9]. This indicates the need for a neuropsychological assessment to identify cognitive deficits in acute care for a better triage of patients to rehabilitation or for discharge home [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%