2020
DOI: 10.30802/aalas-jaalas-19-000170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anesthetic Effects of Intramuscular Alfaxalone–Ketamine in Naked Mole Rats (Heterocephalus glaber)

Abstract: In this study, adult intact male and female (n = 10) naked mole rats (Heterocephalus glaber) were anesthetized by using a combination of ketamine (20 mg/kg IM), and alfaxalone (4.0 mg/kg IM). Induction and recovery times were recorded. Vital parameters, including heart rate, respiratory rate, and reflexes, were monitored every 5 min during the anesthetic period. Anesthetic induction was smooth and rapid. Induction time was significantly longer in male rats (median, 325 s; range, 180 to 385 s) than in females (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smooth induction quality observed in this study is similar to what has been observed in naked mole rats (Heterocephalus glaber) and fivestriped palm squirrels (Funambulus pennantii) receiving various combinations of alfaxalone with ketamine, dexmedetomidine, butorphanol, or midazolam. [12][13][14][15] In contrast, chinchillas (Chinchilla lanigera) anesthetized with alfaxalone-butorphanol experienced rolling, twitching, and tremors throughout induction of anesthesia, mice given alfaxalone or alfaxalonexylazine experienced erratic jumping and limb jerking during induction, and rats frequently twitched during recovery when given alfaxalone intraperitoneally. 13,18,21,32 This could perhaps be attributed to the use of significantly higher alfaxalone doses in rats and mice; however, the chinchillas in the aforementioned study received comparable alfaxalone doses to the dose evaluated in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The smooth induction quality observed in this study is similar to what has been observed in naked mole rats (Heterocephalus glaber) and fivestriped palm squirrels (Funambulus pennantii) receiving various combinations of alfaxalone with ketamine, dexmedetomidine, butorphanol, or midazolam. [12][13][14][15] In contrast, chinchillas (Chinchilla lanigera) anesthetized with alfaxalone-butorphanol experienced rolling, twitching, and tremors throughout induction of anesthesia, mice given alfaxalone or alfaxalonexylazine experienced erratic jumping and limb jerking during induction, and rats frequently twitched during recovery when given alfaxalone intraperitoneally. 13,18,21,32 This could perhaps be attributed to the use of significantly higher alfaxalone doses in rats and mice; however, the chinchillas in the aforementioned study received comparable alfaxalone doses to the dose evaluated in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recovery quality for both studied protocols was smooth with no obvious adverse events, similar to the observed recovery quality of naked mole rats after receiving alfaxalone based anesthetic protocols. 14,15 Prior studies 18,21,32 evaluating alfaxalone in rats and mice or alfaxalone combined with xylazine in mice observed erratic jumping behavior, intense facial scratching, limb jerking, and facial twitching during the recovery period. Five-striped palm squirrels experienced twitching, tail lifting, and vocalization throughout recovery after receiving Body temperature was significantly different between protocols (P < .001), over time (P < .001) (Figure 4), but not with weight (P = .55).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations