Anesthesiologists’ perspectives on why dural punctures occur: a multicenter international survey

Orbach‐Zinger, Sharon; Ioscovich, Alexander; Shatalin, Daniel; Aptekman, Boris; Weiniger, Carolyn F.; Eidelman, Leonid A.; Frenkel, Amit; Beilin, Yaakov; Katz, Daniel; Schlosberg, Ira; Binyamin, Yair

doi:10.1136/rapm-2021-103285

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

(5 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Because of the high morbidity associated with PDPH, many studies have focused on prevention and mitigating its severity [13]. Unfortunately, accidental dural puncture prevention studies have found that many factors are not modifiable [14]. Therefore, research has delved into preventing PDPH once an accidental dural puncture has occurred.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of placement and management of intrathecal catheters following accidental dural puncture on the incidence of postdural puncture headache and severity: a retrospective real‐world study

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryAccidental dural puncture during an attempt to establish labour epidural analgesia can result in postdural puncture headache and long‐term debilitating conditions. Epidural blood patch, the gold standard treatment for this headache, is invasive and not always successful. Inserting an intrathecal catheter after accidental dural puncture may prevent postdural puncture headache. We evaluated the effect of intrathecal catheter insertion on the incidence of postdural puncture headache and the need for epidural blood patch and whether duration of intrathecal catheterisation or injection of intrathecal saline affected outcome. Our retrospective study was conducted at two tertiary, university‐affiliated medical centres between 2017 and 2022 and included 92,651 epidurals and 550 cases of accidental dural puncture (0.59%); 219 parturients (39.8%) received an intrathecal catheter and 331 (60.2%) a resited epidural. Use of an intrathecal catheter versus resiting the epidural did not decrease the odds of postdural puncture headache, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95%CI) 0.91 (0.81–1.01), but was associated with a lower need for epidural blood patch (aOR (95%CI) 0.82 (0.73–0.91), p < 0.001). We found no benefit in leaving in the intrathecal catheter for 24 h postpartum (postdural puncture headache, aOR (95%CI) 1.01 (1.00–1.02), p = 0.015; epidural blood patch, aOR (95%CI) 1.00 (0.99–1.01), p = 0.40). We found an added benefit of injecting intrathecal saline as it decreased the incidence of postdural puncture headache (aOR (95%CI) 0.85 (0.73–0.99), p = 0.04) and the need for epidural blood patch (aOR (95%CI) 0.75 (0.64–0.87), p < 0.001). Our study confirms the benefits of intrathecal catheterisation and provides guidance on how to best manage an intrathecal catheter.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%