Anesthesia personnel’s visual attention regarding patient monitoring in simulated non-critical and critical situations, an eye-tracking study

Abstract

Background Cognitive ergonomics design of patient monitoring may reduce human factor errors in high-stress environments. Eye-tracking is a suitable tool to gain insight into the distribution of visual attention of healthcare professionals with patient monitors, which may facilitate their further development. Methods This prospective, exploratory, high-fidelity simulation study compared anesthesia personnel’s visual attention (fixation count and dwell-time) to 15 areas of interest on the patient monitor during non-critical and critical anesthesia situations. Furthermore, we examined the extent to which participants’ experience influenced visual attention and which vital signs displayed on the patient monitor received the most visual attention. We used mixed zero-inflated Poisson regression and mixed linear models to analyze the data. Results Analyzing 23 ten-minute scenarios, we found significantly more fixations to the areas of interest on the patient monitor during critical than non-critical situations (rate ratio of 1.45; 95% CI 1.33 to 1.59; p < 0.001). However, the dwell-time on the areas of interest did not significantly differ between the non-critical and critical situations (coefficient of − 1.667; 95% CI − 4.549 to 1.229; p = 0.27). The professional experience did not significantly influence the visual attention (fixation: rate ratio of 0.88; 95% CI 0.54 to 1.43; p = 0.61 and dwell-time: coefficient of 0.889; 95% CI − 1.465 to 3.229; p = 0.27). Over all situations, anesthesia personnel paid the most attention to the vital signs blood pressure (fixation: mean [SD] of 108 [74.83]; dwell-time: mean [SD] of 27 [15.90] seconds), end-expiratory carbon dioxide (fixation: mean [SD] of 59 [47.39]; dwell-time: mean [SD] of 30 [21.51] seconds), and the electrocardiogram (fixation: mean [SD] of 58 [64.70]; dwell-time: mean [SD] of 15 [14.95] seconds). Conclusions Critical anesthesia situations increased anesthesia personnel’s visual interaction with the patient monitor. Furthermore, we found that their visual attention focused mainly on a few vital signs. To assist clinicians in critical situations, manufacturers should optimize monitors to convey necessary information as easily and quickly as possible and optimize the visibility of less frequently observed but equally critical vital signs, especially when they are in an abnormal range.

Open Your Ears and Take a Look: A State‐of‐the‐Art Report on the Integration of Sonification and Visualization

“…Besides the approaches to audiovisual data analysis described in the previous sections of this report, audiovisual monitoring interfaces play an integral role in various domains, including air traffic control [EBL*23], control rooms [SFLD22, HHG*12], anesthesia [AQH*21,RMS*22], neurology [LCS*28], dermoscopy [WRK*19], surgery [Zie23], network monitoring [Wor19a,AHvR*21], automotive [JDS15,XWX*22], to name a few.…”

Cognitive Ergonomics: A Review of Interventions for Outpatient Practice

“…In an eye-tracking study of anesthesia personnel, visual attention to 15 areas of interest on the patient monitor was measured [ 21 ]. Results showed that a few vital signs commanded the most attention, namely blood pressure (BP), expiratory carbon dioxide, and electrocardiogram (ECG).…”