Anerkennung 2010
DOI: 10.30965/9783657768394_005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anerkennung ist nicht Toleranz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Diehm, respect and recognition cannot be taught explicitly. Those values need to be lived and experienced rather than discussed in order to be passed on (Diehm 2010). For institutions of early childhood education to develop a culture of respect and recognition would include recognising and valuing the different languages that children speak (Edelmann 2018, p. 127).…”
Section: Fostering Language Acquisition and An Adaptation Profile Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Diehm, respect and recognition cannot be taught explicitly. Those values need to be lived and experienced rather than discussed in order to be passed on (Diehm 2010). For institutions of early childhood education to develop a culture of respect and recognition would include recognising and valuing the different languages that children speak (Edelmann 2018, p. 127).…”
Section: Fostering Language Acquisition and An Adaptation Profile Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the teacher's comments of recognition should remain in the realm of what the child was ready to share and not push the topic any further with closed or directive questions, especially if the child signals that s/he is not ready to be addressed as an expert on this matter (for example his/her first language). This way the teacher has the chance to incidentally recognise and value shared differences, keeping the danger of misjudgement at bay and giving an example for a culture of recognition (Diehm 2010).…”
Section: Implications For Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are good reasons for this: many historical and contemporary political examples of problematic and, in many cases, binary-structured (`us´against `them´) essentialist argumentations exist, which are expressive of anti-pluralistic and anti-democratic sentiments and intolerance (e.g., `retrotopian´fantasies of right-wing populists that claim to be able to speak for the `people´and to make Germany, Italy or the USA `pure´and `great again´: Baumann, 2017). Likewise, qualitative social research on the practice of tolerance education indicates that educational demands to tolerate X can have a strong tendency to operate with essentialist constructions (Diehm, 2010). The same holds for empirical research on the depiction of different cultures and groups in school books (Fuchs, Niehaus, & Stoletzki, 2014).…”
Section: Essentialism and The Essence Of Politicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Zweitens: Grenzen sind dem Begriff immanent. Drittens: Sie impliziert hierarchische Vorstellungen, dass"eine Minderheit von der Mehrheit (und nicht umgekehrt) geduldet werde"(Diehm 2010; siehe auch Forst 2013). Meist wird Toleranz auch mit Akzeptanz und Anerkennung assoziiert, d. h. die hier verwendeten Toleranzbegriffe gehen in dem Verständnis der ‚Anerkennung der politischen Gemeinschaft' auf.…”
unclassified