2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-8388(00)00949-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anelastic relaxation due to interstitial solute atoms in face-centred cubic metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, to a first approximation, the peak height varies as the square of the carbon concentration, as observed in several investigations for a carbon peak in pure nickel. [14] This is an expected result given the relatively large carbon concentrations involved and reports of carbon-carbon pair binding, with binding energies of the order 5 to 10 kJ/mol, for pure nickel. [14] Note that these carbon-carbon binding energies are small compared to the C-V binding energies of about 35 to 40 kJ/mol reported in subsequent sections of this article.…”
Section: Internal Frictionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Indeed, to a first approximation, the peak height varies as the square of the carbon concentration, as observed in several investigations for a carbon peak in pure nickel. [14] This is an expected result given the relatively large carbon concentrations involved and reports of carbon-carbon pair binding, with binding energies of the order 5 to 10 kJ/mol, for pure nickel. [14] Note that these carbon-carbon binding energies are small compared to the C-V binding energies of about 35 to 40 kJ/mol reported in subsequent sections of this article.…”
Section: Internal Frictionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…They, furthermore, show that this negligible level of binding is consistent with the experimental estimates of the C-C pair concentration as a function of total C concentration. 93 From the data presented above we would suggest that C-C and N-N interactions in Fe-based austenitic alloys will be repulsive at 1 nn and 2 nn, with binding energies in the range from −0.1 to −0.2 eV. We would, furthermore, expect the level of repulsion to be reduced as a function of increasing Ni concentration.…”
Section: Solute-solute Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As they give rise to a noncubic lattice distortion, these point-defect pairs can reorient in the stress field of the partial dislocations by the single hop of the vacancy or the carbon atom to a more favorable position, effectively locking the partial dislocation. [14,15] Alternatively, the 1/6 h112i-type shear of the leading partial dislocation disturbs the original fcc stacking sequence and traps the interstitial carbon atom of the point-defect pair in a transient nonequilibrium interstitial position. The carbon atoms can be transferred back to an octahedral position within the stacking fault by a single diffusional jump, and if enough pointdefect pairs are present, they effectively make it more difficult for the trailing partial dislocation to restore the fcc lattice.…”
Section: Jinkyung Kim and Bc De Coomanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] This value is about half the value of the activation energy for carbon diffusion in c-Fe. Anelasticity due to the stress-induced reorientation of point-defect complexes in fcc steels has been ascribed to second-neighbor interstitial-interstitial solute pairs, [14,[17][18][19] interstitial-substitutional solute pairs, [14,18,20] and interstitial solute-vacancy pairs. [15,[21][22][23][24] There have been several reports indicating that whereas the nearest-neighbor C-C interaction was repulsive, the C-vacancy interaction [15,[21][22][23][24][25][26] and the C-Mn interaction [25,26] in austenitic alloys were both attractive.…”
Section: Jinkyung Kim and Bc De Coomanmentioning
confidence: 99%