Anecic earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris) alleviate negative effects of extreme rainfall events on soil and plants in field mesocosms

Abstract

Background and aims Intense rains are becoming more frequent. By causing waterlogging, they may increase soil erosion and soil surface compaction, hamper seedling establishment, and reduce plant growth. Since anecic earthworms make vertical burrows that improve water infiltration, we hypothesised that they can counteract such disturbance. Methods In a field experiment, intact soil mesocosms with ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum), with or without introduced adult Lumbricus terrestris, underwent either a precipitation regime with two intense rain events (36 mm, at beginning and end of spring), or a control regime with the same cumulative rainfall but no intense events. Short-term response of soil moisture and lagged response of plant growth were measured, and soil macroporosity was quantified. Results Intense rains reduced ryegrass shoot biomass (by 16-21 % on average) only in the absence of earthworms. Waterlogging duration aboveground was not affected, whereas soil moisture contents after intense rainfall tended to drop faster with earthworms present. Continuous vertical macropores were found only in the mesocosms to which earthworms had been added. The number of such macropores was 2.4 times higher under the intense precipitation regime, despite similar earthworm survival. Conclusions We found that anecic earthworms can offset negative effects of intense rainfall on plant growth aboveground. Underlying mechanisms, such as macropore formation and enhanced nutrient cycling, are discussed. We also observed that altered precipitation patterns can modify earthworm burrowing behaviour, as earthworms had produced more burrows under the intense regime.

Soil fauna: key to new carbon models

“…Mounds and burrows are obvious signs of physical heterogeneity created by ecosystem engineers (Meysmann et al, 2006;Wilkinson et al, 2009;Sanders et al, 2014). These structures significantly affect microorganisms and plants (Chauvel et al, 1999;Frelich et al, 2006) and associated soil properties such as aggregate stability (Bossuyt et al, 2005(Bossuyt et al, , 2006 and hydraulic properties (Bottinelli et al, 2015;Andriuzzi et al, 2015). This has consequences for the sorption and degradation (Edwards et al, 1992;Bolduan and Zehe, 2006) and for C emissions Lopes de Gerenyu et al, 2015).…”

Responses of belowground communities to large aboveground herbivores: Meta‐analysis reveals biome‐dependent patterns and critical research gaps

“…Soil microbial and animal communities control key ecosystem processes such as decomposition and primary production and are in turn influenced by the activity of aboveground organisms (Gessner et al., ; Wardle et al., ). Recent studies have highlighted previously underrated effects of soil biota on plants (Andriuzzi, Pulleman, Schmidt, Faber, & Brussaard, ; Babikova et al., ; Blouin et al., ), and functional linkages spanning multiple trophic levels (Howison, Berg, Smit, van Dijk, & Olff, ; Johnson, Staley, McLeod, & Hartley, ; Zhao, Griffin, Wu, & Sun, ). Nonetheless, general rules in how belowground and aboveground communities influence each other remain challenging to identify, even for one of the most widespread and conspicuous components of terrestrial ecosystems: aboveground herbivores.…”

Soil biodiversity and soil erosion: It is time to get married

“…A few studies have linked soil erosion to possible changes of soil biological functions. In some cases, soil runoff promotes services associated with soil biodiversity, such as nutrient cycling and plant growth (Andriuzzi, Pulleman, Schmidt, Faber, & Brussaard, ). In other situations, the effects are the opposite, such as erosion slowing down microbial decomposition of organic matter (Park, Meusburger, Jang, Kang, & Alewell, ) or intensive rainfall events diminishing mycorrhizal symbiosis assembly (Barnes, Gast, McNamara, Rowe, & Bending, ).…”