2022 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Speech Technology (AIST) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/aist55798.2022.10064946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Android Ransomware Detection Toolkit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimentation showed that static analysis have approximately a 40-55% detection accuracy regarding 100% of dynamic analyses. Also as a hybrid approach, Arora and Kumar combined static with dynamic detection to introduce a ransomware detection toolkit in [38]. The static features (permissions and APIs) were passed through an artificial neural network, while the dynamic ones (network traffic) were passed through an LGBM classifier to detect ransomware on the network.…”
Section: Background Of Ransomware Detection For Android Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimentation showed that static analysis have approximately a 40-55% detection accuracy regarding 100% of dynamic analyses. Also as a hybrid approach, Arora and Kumar combined static with dynamic detection to introduce a ransomware detection toolkit in [38]. The static features (permissions and APIs) were passed through an artificial neural network, while the dynamic ones (network traffic) were passed through an LGBM classifier to detect ransomware on the network.…”
Section: Background Of Ransomware Detection For Android Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5], Android application and network layer features were employed in ML models, resulting in detection rates of 99 and 81%, respectively. In [6], static and dynamic artifacts were utilized to classify Android applications and address the challenge of ransomware, surpassing the existing solutions. Meanwhile, other studies' proposed models and methods ranging from system permission features to ensemble ML approaches, achieving accuracies between 94% and 99% [7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%