2014 Eighth International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Apps, Services and Technologies 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ngmast.2014.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Android Malware Detection Using Parallel Machine Learning Classifiers

Abstract: Abstract-Mobile malware has continued to grow at an alarming rate despite on-going mitigation efforts. This has been much more prevalent on Android due to being an open platform that is rapidly overtaking other competing platforms in the mobile smart devices market. Recently, a new generation of Android malware families has emerged with advanced evasion capabilities which make them much more difficult to detect using conventional methods. This paper proposes and investigates a parallel machine learning based c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3, is a graph of the respective weighted F-measures. The results of DroidFusion are also compared to those of three classifier combination methods: Majority Vote, Maximum Probability and Average of Probabilities [13], and a meta learning method known as MultiScheme. The MultiScheme approach evaluates a given number of base classifiers in order to select the best model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3, is a graph of the respective weighted F-measures. The results of DroidFusion are also compared to those of three classifier combination methods: Majority Vote, Maximum Probability and Average of Probabilities [13], and a meta learning method known as MultiScheme. The MultiScheme approach evaluates a given number of base classifiers in order to select the best model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yerima et al [13] compared several classifier fusion methods i.e. Majority vote, Product of probabilities, Maximum probability, and Average of probabilities using J48, Naive Bayes, PART, RIDOR, and Simple Logistic classfiers.…”
Section: Android Malware Detection With Classifier Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En iyi doğruluk oranının olasılıkların çarpımı şemasından geldiği görülmüştür. Şemanın tüm performans sonuçlarının tek sınıflandırıcılardan daha iyi olduğu görülmüştür [13]. Şekil 5'te bu yaklaşımın mimarisi gösterilmiştir.…”
Section: Mobi̇l Kötücül Yazilim (Mobile Malware)unclassified
“…Bileşik paralel sınıflandırıcı yaklaşımı [13] Suarez-Tangil ve arkadaşları metin madenciliği ve bilgi alma tekniklerine dayalı bir sistem olan Dendroid'i önermişlerdir. Bu çalışmada, akıllı telefon kötücül yazılım örnekleri ve ailelerinin onların yazılım bileşenlerinde mevcut olan kod yapılarına dayanarak otomatik olarak analiz edilmesi için metin madenciliği yaklaşımlarının kullanımları araştırılmıştır.…”
Section: Veri̇ Setleri̇ üZeri̇nden Kötücül Yazilim Tespi̇ti̇ Yaklaşimlunclassified
“…Previous work has also used app permissions to pinpoint malware [12,13,14]. Sarma et al [12] use risk signals extracted from app permissions, e.g., rare critical permissions (RCP) and rare pairs of critical permissions (RPCP), to train SVM and inform users of the risks vs. benefits tradeoffs of apps.…”
Section: Research In Android Malware Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%