2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.11.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Androgenic and antiandrogenic activities in water and sediment samples from the river Lambro, Italy, detected by yeast androgen screen and chemical analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The androgenic potency in Swedish domestic STP effluents varied from not detected to 160 ng DEQ/L [38], which is slightly higher than the potencies in the four STP effluents from the present study. Androgenic activity was less frequently detected in surface water and sediment of the Pearl River system, which is consistent with the results of some previous studies [13,39,40]. The possible explanation for the lower androgenic activity is that the agonistic androgenic potency might be masked by androgen receptor antagonists in the extracts [12,40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The androgenic potency in Swedish domestic STP effluents varied from not detected to 160 ng DEQ/L [38], which is slightly higher than the potencies in the four STP effluents from the present study. Androgenic activity was less frequently detected in surface water and sediment of the Pearl River system, which is consistent with the results of some previous studies [13,39,40]. The possible explanation for the lower androgenic activity is that the agonistic androgenic potency might be masked by androgen receptor antagonists in the extracts [12,40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The possible explanation for the lower androgenic activity is that the agonistic androgenic potency might be masked by androgen receptor antagonists in the extracts [12,40]. Hence, antiandrogenic activity is usually prevalent in various environmental matrices as demonstrated in the present and previous studies [39,40]. Another reason for prevalent estrogenic and antiandrogenic activities in the environment could be the wide presence of estrogenic chemicals in surface waters [6,28] and some xenoestrogen chemicals such as bisphenol A and o,p 0 -DDT (o,p 0 -1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane) could display both estrogenic activity and antiandrogenic activity in the environment [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…BPA has been found in water, surface waters, ground waters, wastewaters, sediments, sewage sludges, landfill leachates, influents and effluents of wastewater treatment plants, garbage leakages, and even tap water (Bruchet et al, 2014;Focazio et al, 2008;Furhacker et al, 2004;Jardim et al, 2012;Nie et al, 2012;Seyhi et al, 2011Seyhi et al, , 2013Shao et al, 2008;Urbatzka et al, 2007;Vethaak et al, 2005;Yamamoto et al, 2001), revealing the potential risk of public exposure to BPA. For example, the maximum concentrations of BPA were found to be 17.2 mg/L in waste landfill leachates (Yamamoto et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed the basic protocol described in Sohoni and Sumpter (1998), but with modifications for the yeast antiandrogen screen (anti-YAS) as described in later studies (Urbatzka et al, 2007b;Kolle et al, 2011). In brief, assay medium was prepared by adding 0.5 mℓ CPRG to 50 mℓ of fresh growth medium.…”
Section: Recombinant Yeast Anti-androgen Screen (Anti-yas) Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemicals having endocrine-disrupting (ED) effects on the reproductive system can in general be categorised in 1 of 4 mode-of-action (MOA) groups (responses), namely, oestrogenic, anti-oestrogenic, androgenic or anti-androgenic (Behrends et al, 2010;Hoffmann and Kloas, 2010). The majority of EDC studies conducted to date have focused on EDCs modulating the oestrogenic response system in one way or the other (Sohoni and Sumpter, 1998;Urbatzka et al, 2007aUrbatzka et al, & 2007bKloas et al, 2009;Behrends et al, 2010). In contrast to the intensive research focus on manmade chemicals that potentially disrupt normal oestrogenic function, relatively few studies have addressed interaction with the androgenic endocrine systems, either from an agonistic or antagonistic perspective (Urbatzka et al, 2007a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%