“…Thus, based on study determinations, the gene expression pattern for small molecule hormone receptor interaction between the 2.6 x 10 5 to 2.1 x 10 6 min�count range results in a negative Δ C micro response and an initial downward shift in the contraction with unilateral expansion as compared to positive Δ C micro response with contraction and bidirectional expansion, and irrespective of the specific steriod axis receptor class (ER, AR). Furthermore, it appears that an initial negative (-) Δ C micro response within the 1.86 x 10 6 to 1.94 x 10 6 (IGF-II � IGF-IIR) min�count range is coupled to a positive Δ C micro response, as Dht or R1881 � CM AR (1.79E + 05-2.45E + 05, + P eff ) results in the transcription of pro-proliferative genes [118,119], that is proposed to be by an initial (-) P eff Χ then an (+) P eff Y intermediate step coupled to resultant transcriptional activation of MKI67 (P eff 0.329) [Part I, not cited; 38] ( Table 9); thus, expression of a focal adhesion or endocytic component may be involved, which would apply to calvarial osteoblasts that overexpress the IGF-IIR/M6P receptor [120], and similarly to transformed cells with P eff shift to Several further studies point in the direction of paradoxical responses to dexamethasone (Dex) treatment, as example of a biologic mimic that produces a parabolic peak grade of positive P eff response and corticosterone surrogate, in which case observed divergent gene expression responses upon applied Dex are in dissimilar cell types [123], due to dose response and variant GR receptor affinity [124], or during the tuned activation of Dex responsive genes with GRE sequence sites in proximity to the TSS [125]. The magnitude of differential gene expression response in cultured primary astrocyte and neurons to Dex stimulation is consistent with respective increases in duration at P eff contraction-expansion phase gene expression in a less and more compliant cell type to the same agent (ie PER1, FKBP5; 5.3x) [123], in which case it appears that the difference in magnitude of differential gene expression achieved in-between cell types is unlikely attributable to ligand � receptor min�count, as astrocyte GR mRNA is 3x-overfold neuronal in which case only an apparent difference in t 1/2 at receptor exists; whereas, the same in the high affinity variant porcGR (ala 610 val) transgenic model, in which an under-expression of GCLC (P eff 0.477) and PCK1 (P eff 0.333), and overexpression of FKBP5 (P eff 0.342) follows a saturable dose-escalation differential gene expression pattern [124], and is attributable to an upward contraction-expansion shift in P eff response with maintained range of ligand � receptor affinity.…”