1996
DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00616-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Androgen-like and anti-androgen-like effects of antiprogestins in human mammary cancer cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, whereas the ability of progesterone to impair male sexual behavior could be related to its antiandrogenic and antiestrogenic properties (Hendricks, 1992), this is not the case with RU486, which apparently does not bind to estrogen receptors (Philibert, 1984). Although at high doses RU486 has sometimes been reported to be weakly antiandrogenic (e.g., Hackenberg et al, 1996;Terouanne et al, 2000), it is more often reported to be a moderate androgen receptor agonist (e.g., Kemppainen, Lane, Sar, & Wilson, 1992;Lu et al, 1991;Miyamoto, Yeh, Wilding, & Chang, 1998), a property that is unlikely to contribute to the present results. Lastly, in a few cases, RU486 has been suggested to act as a progestin agonist in non-neuronal tissue (e.g., Bowden, Hissom, & Moore, 1989), but this may be true only under very specific cellular conditions (Beck, Weigel, Moyer, Nordeen, & Edwards, 1993;Sartorius, Tung, Takimoto, & Horwitz, 1993).…”
Section: Effects Of Neonatal Ru486 On Reproduction In Ratsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Furthermore, whereas the ability of progesterone to impair male sexual behavior could be related to its antiandrogenic and antiestrogenic properties (Hendricks, 1992), this is not the case with RU486, which apparently does not bind to estrogen receptors (Philibert, 1984). Although at high doses RU486 has sometimes been reported to be weakly antiandrogenic (e.g., Hackenberg et al, 1996;Terouanne et al, 2000), it is more often reported to be a moderate androgen receptor agonist (e.g., Kemppainen, Lane, Sar, & Wilson, 1992;Lu et al, 1991;Miyamoto, Yeh, Wilding, & Chang, 1998), a property that is unlikely to contribute to the present results. Lastly, in a few cases, RU486 has been suggested to act as a progestin agonist in non-neuronal tissue (e.g., Bowden, Hissom, & Moore, 1989), but this may be true only under very specific cellular conditions (Beck, Weigel, Moyer, Nordeen, & Edwards, 1993;Sartorius, Tung, Takimoto, & Horwitz, 1993).…”
Section: Effects Of Neonatal Ru486 On Reproduction In Ratsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…4e). Importantly ZK98299 does not alter ER or PR levels [51] and has decreased antiglucocorticoid activity and lacks antiandrogen activity often ascribed to earlier antiprogestins [52]. ZK98299 therefore allows us to conclude that the tumor-cell protective effects we observe are due to the presence of unliganded PR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Given RU486 is well-characterized for its partial agonism, it is possible that ESR1 mutant cells uniquely express a particular strong PR coactivator that confers the partial agonism of RU486 in this context. Another possibility is that RU486 alternatively stimulates other nuclear receptors such as glucocorticoid 93 , 100 or potentially even androgen receptor 101 to reprogram BCKs expression. The reversed PR pharmacological response in ESR1 mutant cells is intriguing and warrants future investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%