“…Furthermore, whereas the ability of progesterone to impair male sexual behavior could be related to its antiandrogenic and antiestrogenic properties (Hendricks, 1992), this is not the case with RU486, which apparently does not bind to estrogen receptors (Philibert, 1984). Although at high doses RU486 has sometimes been reported to be weakly antiandrogenic (e.g., Hackenberg et al, 1996;Terouanne et al, 2000), it is more often reported to be a moderate androgen receptor agonist (e.g., Kemppainen, Lane, Sar, & Wilson, 1992;Lu et al, 1991;Miyamoto, Yeh, Wilding, & Chang, 1998), a property that is unlikely to contribute to the present results. Lastly, in a few cases, RU486 has been suggested to act as a progestin agonist in non-neuronal tissue (e.g., Bowden, Hissom, & Moore, 1989), but this may be true only under very specific cellular conditions (Beck, Weigel, Moyer, Nordeen, & Edwards, 1993;Sartorius, Tung, Takimoto, & Horwitz, 1993).…”