2010
DOI: 10.1143/ptps.184.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anderson Model on Bethe Lattices: Density of States, Localization Properties and Isolated Eigenvalue

Abstract: We revisit the Anderson localization problem on Bethe lattices, putting in contact various aspects which have been previously only discussed separately. For the case of connectivity 3 we compute by the cavity method the density of states and the evolution of the mobility edge with disorder. Furthermore, we show that below a certain critical value of the disorder the smallest eigenvalue remains delocalized and separated by all the others (localized) ones by a gap. We also study the evolution of the mobility edg… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
106
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known from previous studies that the RRG ensemble of sparse random matrices belongs to the GOE universality class (with Wigner-Dyson-level statistics and fully delocalized eigenvectors) [49,50]. Hence, in absence of the hopping rates connecting sites on adjacent layers (t = 0), each layer i corresponds to a M × M GOElike block, with energy spectra akin to semicircle laws of width 4γ √ k [51] and centered around i . When the interlayer hopping matrix elements is turned on (t > 0), these GOE-like blocks become then coupled along the chain.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is known from previous studies that the RRG ensemble of sparse random matrices belongs to the GOE universality class (with Wigner-Dyson-level statistics and fully delocalized eigenvectors) [49,50]. Hence, in absence of the hopping rates connecting sites on adjacent layers (t = 0), each layer i corresponds to a M × M GOElike block, with energy spectra akin to semicircle laws of width 4γ √ k [51] and centered around i . When the interlayer hopping matrix elements is turned on (t > 0), these GOE-like blocks become then coupled along the chain.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model (1) allows, in principle, for an exact solution which yield the probability distribution function of the diagonal elements of the resolvent matrix, defined as G(z) = (H − zI) −1 [51,53]. In order to obtain the recursive equations, the key objects are the so-called cavity Green's functions, i.e., the diagonal elements on a given site i of the resolvent matrix of the modified Hamiltonian where the edge between the site (i, p) and one of its neighbors has been removed.…”
Section: Exact Recursion Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the explicit form of this distribution, we refer the reader to 29 . For k = 2, where each node is connected precisely to three neighbors, all eigenfunctions become localized provided W > W c 17.4 3,11 . The value of W c is the same for the infinitely large Cayley tree and the RRG.…”
Section: The Anderson Model On a Regular Randommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resolvent elements at z and −z * are both calculated on the same cavity graph [22,35], defined as the graph in which an arbitrary node and all its edges are deleted. Equation (34) has a simpler form when compared to Eq.…”
Section: The Statistical Properties Of the Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantity g represents the diagonal elements of the resolvent on the cavity graph [22,35]. Substituting Eq.…”
Section: B Random Regular Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%