2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.115.076601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anderson Localization and the Quantum Phase Diagram of Three Dimensional Disordered Dirac Semimetals

Abstract: We study the quantum phase diagram of a three dimensional noninteracting Dirac semimetal in the presence of either quenched axial or scalar potential disorder, by calculating the average and the typical density of states as well as the inverse participation ratio using numerically exact methods. We show that as a function of the disorder strength a half-filled (i.e., undoped) Dirac semimetal displays three distinct ground states, namely an incompressible semimetal, a compressible diffusive metal, and a localiz… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

12
192
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
12
192
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In all of these numerical calculations, the CCFS inequality ν ≥ 2=d is well satisfied. It is important to mention that totally independent from this SM to DM transition, at a much larger disorder strength, the Anderson localization transition has been established in some of these models [28,35]. The current work is entirely in the low-disorder regime (where the SM-DM-avoided QCP resides) and has nothing to do with the high-disorder Anderson localization transition from a DM phase to an Anderson insulator phase [28], which occurs at roughly W l =t ¼ 3.75 for the model under consideration with Gaussian disorder (see the Appendix).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In all of these numerical calculations, the CCFS inequality ν ≥ 2=d is well satisfied. It is important to mention that totally independent from this SM to DM transition, at a much larger disorder strength, the Anderson localization transition has been established in some of these models [28,35]. The current work is entirely in the low-disorder regime (where the SM-DM-avoided QCP resides) and has nothing to do with the high-disorder Anderson localization transition from a DM phase to an Anderson insulator phase [28], which occurs at roughly W l =t ¼ 3.75 for the model under consideration with Gaussian disorder (see the Appendix).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Because of the invariable presence of disorder in all solid-state materials, there has been a substantial amount of theoretical activity studying the effect of disorder on noninteracting Dirac and Weyl fermions [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Focusing on the undoped (i.e., Fermi energy at E ¼ 0) Dirac point (i.e., the band touching point), the quadratically vanishing density of states at zero energy [ρðEÞ ∼ E 2 ] associated with the linear three-dimensional energy band dispersion places these problems in a different class than that of a conventional metal with a parabolic energy dispersion and a nonzero Fermi energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To find a clear difference between them, we need to consider the density of bulk states at Weyl nodes, which jumps to a finite value from zero at the transition to a diffusive metal phase. [33][34][35][36][37][38][39]46) Note that, in previous studies on this subject, the role of Fermi arc surface states is not explicitly considered, except in Refs. 46, 48, and 49.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flat bands are typical characteristics of localized resonant wave modes that are interesting and important in both quantum and classical systems. 22,23 In this paper, we study the dispersion relations of a two-dimensional (2D) AC consisting of a square array of honey-coated air cylinders immersed in a water host. We find that at the BZ center a quadratic band is tangent to a flat band, with the latter being the fingerprint of locally resonant modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%