2022
DOI: 10.1002/nla.2438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anderson acceleration of the modulus‐based matrix splitting algorithms for horizontal nonlinear complementarity systems

Abstract: In this paper, enlightened by the effectiveness of Anderson acceleration (AA), a well‐established technique for accelerating fixed‐point solvers, we first present the Anderson accelerating modulus‐based matrix splitting (AAMS) algorithms for a class of horizontal nonlinear complementarity problems. Then, by introducing the strong semi‐smoothness of the absolute value function, we establish the local convergence theory of the AAMS algorithms. More importantly, we provide the optimal parameter for the AAMS algor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, for LCP(A,b,+n$$ A,b,{\mathbb{R}}_{+}^n $$), Li et al 31 proposed a practical selection strategy of the optimal parameter of the MMS algorithm, by introducing a mapping ψfalse(xfalse):=diagfalse(signfalse(xfalse)false)nprefix×n0.3emfalse(xnfalse)$$ \psi (x):= \operatorname{diag}\left(\operatorname{sign}(x)\right)\in {\mathbb{R}}^{n\times n}\kern0.3em \left(x\in {\mathbb{R}}^n\right) $$ such that ψfalse(xfalse)x=false|xfalse|,$$ \psi (x)x=\mid x\mid, $$ thus reformulating the implicit fixed‐point equation explicitly. Further, by using this mapping ψfalse(xfalse)$$ \psi (x) $$, the estimation of the optimal parameter of the MMS algorithm for horizontal nonlinear complementarity problems is presented as well in Reference 32. However, the results in References 31 and 32 are not applicable to SOCLCP(A,b,𝒦×q), because the involved absolute value function ABSfalse(·false)$$ ABS\left(\cdotp \right) $$ in the implicit fixed‐point Equation (4) is based on Jordan algebra, so the mapping is different and more complicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, for LCP(A,b,+n$$ A,b,{\mathbb{R}}_{+}^n $$), Li et al 31 proposed a practical selection strategy of the optimal parameter of the MMS algorithm, by introducing a mapping ψfalse(xfalse):=diagfalse(signfalse(xfalse)false)nprefix×n0.3emfalse(xnfalse)$$ \psi (x):= \operatorname{diag}\left(\operatorname{sign}(x)\right)\in {\mathbb{R}}^{n\times n}\kern0.3em \left(x\in {\mathbb{R}}^n\right) $$ such that ψfalse(xfalse)x=false|xfalse|,$$ \psi (x)x=\mid x\mid, $$ thus reformulating the implicit fixed‐point equation explicitly. Further, by using this mapping ψfalse(xfalse)$$ \psi (x) $$, the estimation of the optimal parameter of the MMS algorithm for horizontal nonlinear complementarity problems is presented as well in Reference 32. However, the results in References 31 and 32 are not applicable to SOCLCP(A,b,𝒦×q), because the involved absolute value function ABSfalse(·false)$$ ABS\left(\cdotp \right) $$ in the implicit fixed‐point Equation (4) is based on Jordan algebra, so the mapping is different and more complicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, by using this mapping ψfalse(xfalse)$$ \psi (x) $$, the estimation of the optimal parameter of the MMS algorithm for horizontal nonlinear complementarity problems is presented as well in Reference 32. However, the results in References 31 and 32 are not applicable to SOCLCP(A,b,𝒦×q), because the involved absolute value function ABSfalse(·false)$$ ABS\left(\cdotp \right) $$ in the implicit fixed‐point Equation (4) is based on Jordan algebra, so the mapping is different and more complicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%