2014
DOI: 10.1123/shr.2013-0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

And Then There Were Three: The NCAA’s Struggle for Reorganization and the Emergence of Division III Athletics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One reason the NCAA added another division was because of "the increasing difficulty of maintaining a level playing field between smaller-budget schools and those with major athletics programs" (Crowley, 2006). Another reason was the pressure from other college sports organizations (namely the National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics) resulted in the creation of another division that might be attractive for schools from other organizations (Katz and Seifried, 2014). Table 1 shows the number of institutions that switched Divisions from 1972 to 1973 8 .…”
Section: The Division Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason the NCAA added another division was because of "the increasing difficulty of maintaining a level playing field between smaller-budget schools and those with major athletics programs" (Crowley, 2006). Another reason was the pressure from other college sports organizations (namely the National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics) resulted in the creation of another division that might be attractive for schools from other organizations (Katz and Seifried, 2014). Table 1 shows the number of institutions that switched Divisions from 1972 to 1973 8 .…”
Section: The Division Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the NCAA restructured into a three-division model in 1973 (Katz & Seifried, 2014), the impact of the NCAA's "smallest" division has remained overshadowed by academic and commercial studies over the role of big-time college sport (Katz & Clopton, 2014). This is not to say that scholars have entirely overlooked Division III as a research setting, as scholars have produced a wide spectrum of topical studies within the context of Division III athletics.…”
Section: Small House: Division III Sportsmentioning
confidence: 99%