The 3-hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutyrate (3HP/4HB) pathway of carbon fixation is found in thermophilic Crenarchaeota of the order Sulfolobales and in aerobic, ammonia-oxidizing Thaumarchaeota. Unlike all other known autotrophic carbon metabolisms, this pathway exclusively uses HCO 3rather than CO 2 as the substrate for carbon fixation. Biomass produced by the 3HB/4HP pathway is relatively 13 Cenriched compared to biomass fixed by other autotrophic pathways, with total biosynthetic isotope effects ( Ar) of ca. 3‰ in the Sulfolobales and ca. 20‰ in the Thaumarchaeota. Explanations for the difference between these values usually invoke the dual effects of thermophily and growth at low pH (low [ ]) HCO-3 for the former group vs. mesophily and growth at pH > 7 (high [ ]) for the latter group. Here we HCO-3 examine the model taxa Metallosphaera sedula and Nitrosopumilus maritimus using an isotope fluxbalance model to argue that the primary cause of different Ar values more likely is the presence of carbonic anhydrase in M. sedula and its corresponding absence in N. maritimus. The results suggest that the pool of inside N. maritimus is out of isotopic equilibrium with CO 2 and that the organism imports < 10% HCO-3 from the extracellular environment. If correct and generalizable, the aerobic, ammonia-oxidizing HCO-3 marine Thaumarchaeota are dependent on passive CO 2 uptake and a slow rate of intracellular conversion to. Values of Ar should therefore vary in response to growth rate () and CO 2 availability, analogous HCO-3 to eukaryotic algae, but in the opposite direction: Ar becomes smaller as [CO 2(aq) ] increases and/or decreases. Such an idea represents a testable hypothesis, both in the laboratory and in natural systems. Sensitivity to and CO 2 implies that measurements of Ar may hold promise as a pCO 2 paleobarometer. 3 CO 2-yet isotopically, it is distinct. The marked difference in Ar values between thermoacidophilic Sulfolobales and the ammoniaoxidizing marine Thaumarchaeota is well recognized (e.g., Könneke et al., 2012; 2014) but has not yet been quantitatively explained. Explanation of the 20‰ Ar value in Thaumarchaeota generally invokes both