2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2021.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ancient Y-DNA with reconstructed phylogeny provides insights into the demographic history of paternal haplogroup N1a2-F1360

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This topology suggests that the population expansion experienced by this paternal line around 3,000 years ago was the most significant of all paternal lineages in ancient East Asian populations at the same history period. Previously, ancient DNA studies suggested that this paternal line may be the paternal lineage of the Zhou Dynasty, the third dynasty of ancient China (Ma et al, 2021;Wei et al, 2022). The differentiation topology of this study supports the results of ancient DNA findings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This topology suggests that the population expansion experienced by this paternal line around 3,000 years ago was the most significant of all paternal lineages in ancient East Asian populations at the same history period. Previously, ancient DNA studies suggested that this paternal line may be the paternal lineage of the Zhou Dynasty, the third dynasty of ancient China (Ma et al, 2021;Wei et al, 2022). The differentiation topology of this study supports the results of ancient DNA findings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, ancient DNA studies showed that N1a2a-F1101 was likely the paternal lineage of the royal family of the third dynasty of ancient China, the Zhou Dynasty (1027-256 BC) (Ma et al, 2021;Wei et al, 2022). The Zhou dynasty was the last dynasty of the Bronze Age in central China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N-F1206 can be sub-divided into N-TAT and N-F710. The highest frequency of N-TAT is found in Altaic, Uralic, and Indo-European speaking populations ( Ilumäe et al, 2016 ), such as Vilyuy Yakuts (91.525%), Evenks (50.877%), Buryats (41.441%), Udmurts (66.667%), Finns (53.846%), and Latvians (43.023%), while the N-F710 is considered as having migrated from Northeast Asia southward into the Yellow River region at no later than 2.7 kya ( Ma et al, 2021 ). Haplogroup Q-M120 originated in South Siberia and expanded across northwestern China between 5–3 kya ( Sun et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paleogenomic studies indicated that northern East Asian-related ancestry has expanded southward since the Neolithic period (Ning et al, 2020;Yang et al, 2020), and western Eurasian-related ancestry has expanded eastward since the early Bronze Age (Wang W. et al, 2021;Zhang F. et al, 2021). Previous studies found that western and northern East Asian pastoralists played an important role in the formation of early China, Chinese culture, and Huaxia people (Sun et al, 2019;Ma et al, 2021). Frequent population exchange and dynamic population history promote population admixture, but based on advanced agriculture, technology, and culture, the Han people or their ancestors often had a greater demographic advantage over ancient ethnic groups in East Asia, so they often assimilated with the population and culture of other ethnic groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%