“…However, concerns for postmortem bone diagenesis must also be considered, and investigators such as Stout (1978) noted that methods like photon-absorptiometry may not be reliable due to poor bone preservation. The physical, chemical, and biological elements of the burial environment all contribute to bone diagenesis (Solomon and Haas, 1967;Race et al, 1968;Marchiafava et al, 1974;Hackett, 1981;White and Hannus, 1983;Von Endt and Ortner, 1984), and several investigators have cautioned that diagenetic effects can alter the accuracy of chemical and histological methods (Piepenbrink, 1986;Garland, 1987;Hancock et al, 1987Hancock et al, , 1989Hanson and Buikstra, 1987) and even create pseudopathological changes (Bell, 1990;Bell and Jones, 1991;Matt, 1993). Variation in the levels of bone mineralization or bone density may not be associated with vicissitudes of life but rather with postmortem circumstances that are undetectable with some experimental methods.…”