A Companion to Ethnicity in the Ancient Mediterranean 2014
DOI: 10.1002/9781118834312.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ancient Ethnicity and Modern Identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 In this regard, the contribution of reception studies to our understanding of these trajectories remains underrated, since the modern academic discipline of Roman history itself is a category of reception. For a range of positions on race and ethnicity in the Roman world: Gruen 2020 and Gardner et al 2013; for studies on postclassical interpretations of ancient race and ethnicity and their implications : Isaac 2004;McCoskey 2012;Siapkas 2014; Kennedy forthcoming. 7 One example is the recent decision at the University of California Berkeley's former Department of Classics to change its name to the Department of Ancient Greek and Roman Studies.…”
Section: A Rising Tidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In this regard, the contribution of reception studies to our understanding of these trajectories remains underrated, since the modern academic discipline of Roman history itself is a category of reception. For a range of positions on race and ethnicity in the Roman world: Gruen 2020 and Gardner et al 2013; for studies on postclassical interpretations of ancient race and ethnicity and their implications : Isaac 2004;McCoskey 2012;Siapkas 2014; Kennedy forthcoming. 7 One example is the recent decision at the University of California Berkeley's former Department of Classics to change its name to the Department of Ancient Greek and Roman Studies.…”
Section: A Rising Tidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suffice to say, that archaeological cultures, peoples and races, as well as archaeological periods, are conceptualized as clear-cut bounded monolithic entities in culture-historical archaeology. Another epistemological assumption in culturehistorical archaeology is that a people retain a core of deep-seated essential characteristic traits throughout history (see Jones 1997: 15-25;Siapkas 2003: 46-59;2014). Furthermore, the distribution of characteristic archaeological finds and archaeological cultures reflects the distribution of a people according to the logic of culturehistorical archaeology (Siapkas 2014: 69).…”
Section: Archaeological Negotiations Of Scientific Racismmentioning
confidence: 99%