2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Ancient and Backward or Long-Lived and Sustainable?” The Role of the Past in Debates Concerning Rural Livelihoods and Resource Conservation in Eastern Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These tend to be more place-and problem-focused, and are often oriented toward deconstructing prevailing policy narratives that have directed (some might argue misdirected) environmental interventions at a local level for decades (e.g., French et al 2009;Lane 2009;Sulas 2010). Other projects have sought to better delineate which aspects of contemporary practices can be said to genuinely contribute to socio-ecological and cultural resilience (e.g., Sulas et al 2009;Davies 2012), while also offering critical perspectives on concepts such as 'Indigenous Knowledge' and TEK, and especially the ahistorical manner in which these concepts are currently deployed in rural development projects across the region (Stump 2010(Stump , 2013. Although their specific focus has varied, a unifying aspect to all of these studies has been their concern as much with the limits of archaeological contributions to the task of devising sustainable and resilient agricultural practices today, as on what can be learned by adopting a deep-time perspective and how this knowledge might be applied at a local, community level.…”
Section: Archaeology Of the Anthropocenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tend to be more place-and problem-focused, and are often oriented toward deconstructing prevailing policy narratives that have directed (some might argue misdirected) environmental interventions at a local level for decades (e.g., French et al 2009;Lane 2009;Sulas 2010). Other projects have sought to better delineate which aspects of contemporary practices can be said to genuinely contribute to socio-ecological and cultural resilience (e.g., Sulas et al 2009;Davies 2012), while also offering critical perspectives on concepts such as 'Indigenous Knowledge' and TEK, and especially the ahistorical manner in which these concepts are currently deployed in rural development projects across the region (Stump 2010(Stump , 2013. Although their specific focus has varied, a unifying aspect to all of these studies has been their concern as much with the limits of archaeological contributions to the task of devising sustainable and resilient agricultural practices today, as on what can be learned by adopting a deep-time perspective and how this knowledge might be applied at a local, community level.…”
Section: Archaeology Of the Anthropocenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lessons should also be drawn from the success stories of indigenous soil water conservation measures, ISWC. Focusing on examples of indigenous intensive agriculture in Eastern Africa, Stump (2010) reviewed the potential use of past and precedent data for sustainable resource conservation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doing so can act to put modern landscapes and farming practices in their historical context (e.g., Hall et al, 2013;Morrison, 2015) and can correct simplistic assumptions that evidence of cultural continuity constitutes evidence of sustainable resource use (Stump, 2010) or that the abandonment of a practice demonstrates that it was necessarily unsustainable (for a discussion of which, see, e.g., Balée and Erickson, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%