2013
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anchors for the cosmic distance scale: the Cepheids U Sagittarii, CF Cassiopeiae, and CEab Cassiopeiae

Abstract: New and existing X-ray, UBV JHK s W (1−4) , and spectroscopic observations were analyzed to constrain fundamental parameters for M 25, NGC 7790, and dust along their sight-lines. The star clusters are of particular importance because they host the classical Cepheids U Sgr, CF Cas, and the visual binary Cepheids CEa and CEb Cas. Precise results from the multiband analysis, in tandem with a comprehensive determination of the Cepheids' period evolution (dP/dt) from ∼140 years of observations, helped to resolve c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temperature, gravity, and rotational velocity of boxC stars were measured by fitting the H α and H β Balmer lines and the 4922Å He I feature with synthetic spectra, as was done in Majaess et al (2013) for similar MS stars. With this aim, we employed the fitprof21 code, developed by Bergeron et al (1992) and Saffer et al (1994) and subsequently modified by Napiwotzki et al (1999).…”
Section: Boxesc and D: Stellar Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature, gravity, and rotational velocity of boxC stars were measured by fitting the H α and H β Balmer lines and the 4922Å He I feature with synthetic spectra, as was done in Majaess et al (2013) for similar MS stars. With this aim, we employed the fitprof21 code, developed by Bergeron et al (1992) and Saffer et al (1994) and subsequently modified by Napiwotzki et al (1999).…”
Section: Boxesc and D: Stellar Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distances are evaluated for Cepheids in IC 1613 and NGC 6822 using an updated Galactic calibration tied to cluster Cepheids (e.g., Turner 2010; Majaess et al 2013c), and nearby Cepheids exhibiting HST parallaxes (Benedict et al 2007). The distances are computed using a reddening-free (VI c ) Wesenheit function and nonlinear mid-infrared relations (Neilson et al 2009;Majaess et al 2013a), whereby the latter rely partly on new multi-epoch Spitzer photometry for Galactic Cepheids (Monson et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The population II Cepheids were omitted (Udalski et al 2001;Majaess et al 2009). Cepheid distances were evaluated using the Galactic W VI c relation compiled by Majaess et al (2013c), which is anchored to the HST parallaxes of Benedict et al (2007) and an updated version of the Turner (2010) cluster Cepheid list (W VI c,0 = −3.31 log P 0 − 2.56). For example, new parameters were adopted for the cluster Cepheids SU Cas, V340 Nor, QZ Nor, CF Cas, TW Nor, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So, we also spectroscopically analyzed XZ CMa to confirm or exclude the cluster membership. In fact, cluster Cepheids are important to fixing the distance scale (see, e.g., Majaess et al 2013aMajaess et al , 2013b.…”
Section: Tombaugh1: Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%