Anchors Aweigh: The Sources, Variety, and Challenges of Mission Drift

Abstract

The growing number of studies which reference the concept of mission drift imply that such drift is an undesirable strategic outcome related to inconsistent organizational action, yet beyond such references little is known about how mission drift occurs, how it impacts organizations, and how organizations should respond. Existing management theory more broadly offers initial albeit equivocal insight for understanding mission drift. On the one hand, prior studies have argued that inconsistent or divergent action can lead to weakened stakeholder commitment and reputational damage. On the other hand, scholars have suggested that because environments are complex and dynamic, such action is necessary for ensuring organizational adaptation and thus survival. In this study, we offer a theory of mission drift that unpacks its origin, clarifies its variety, and specifies how organizations might respond to external perceptions of mission drift. The resulting conceptual model addresses the aforementioned theoretical tension and offers novel insight into the relationship between organizational actions and identity.

Staying alive during an unfolding crisis: How SMEs ward off impending disaster

“… How do post-crisis SMEs insulate against future shocks? Advantages of being small vs. young ( Bartz and Winkler, 2016 ) Entrepreneurial financing in times of crisis ( Cowling et al., 2012 ) Entrepreneurial learning processes ( Politis, 2005 ) Mission drift ( Grimes et al., 2019 ) Entrepreneurship and innovation at the base of the pyramid ( Hall et al., 2012 ) Entrepreneurial imaginativeness ( Kier and McMullen, 2018 ) Entrepreneurial failure What happens when entrepreneurs/entrepreneurial teams fail after being exposed to an external shock? Do they start again (and, if so, with or without modifications)?…”

A Framework for Exploring the Degree of Hybridity in Entrepreneurship

“…These tensions 6 can lead to disruptions in resource allocation (Smith, Gonin, & Besharov, 2013), inter-personal conflict that decreases organizational efficiency (Fiol et al, 2009), and decision-making paralysis (Pache & Santos, 2010). Indeed, prior research has demonstrated the long-term impact of the economic-social tension, highlighting the risk of "mission drift" (i.e., unintended divergence from a stated mission or core objective) that can occur when conflict-reconciliation processes result in action that is inconsistent with stated strategic objectives (Ben-Ner, 2002;Ebrahim, et al, 2014;Grimes, Williams, & Zhao, 2018).…”

The regulation of prosocial lending: Are loan ceilings effective?

“…Mission drift is a constant threat to the achievement of social goals that are logically expected by subsidy providers (Wry & York, 2017). In theoretical works, mission drift in prosocial lending is commonly understood as a shift toward serving better-off, and therefore more profitable, clients (Armendariz & Szafarz, 2011;Grimes et al, 2019;Varendh-Mansson et al, 2020). The empirical literature proposes two different approaches: multi-firm studies and case studies.…”