2020
DOI: 10.1080/14631369.2020.1802575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ancestrality, Migration, Rights and Exclusion: Citizenship in the Indian State of Sikkim

Abstract: This is the introduction to a special issue of Asian Ethnicity that includes six papers on the issue of citizenship in the Indian state of Sikkim, from the perspectives of anthropology, political science, sociology and history. These contributions explore the entanglement of migration and ethnicity that defines political membership and exclusion in Sikkim, as it does in other parts of India. They give a central place to the consequences of the combination of the 1961 Sikkim Subject regulation (that remained va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to providing a vital labour force, the ‘pro-British-India-Nepalis’ addressed British anxieties about the pro-Tibetan Sikkimese population (Hiltz, 2003: 71). As Vandenhelsken (2021: 216) notes, ‘the colonial organization of Nepalis in Sikkim was not only driven by economic concerns but also aimed at turning the local Bhutia and Lepcha, whose elites initially opposed colonial rule, into a minority…. Nepali migration in Sikkim was ‘weaponized’ by the colonial administration, setting the ground for reification of antagonistic relations between the “settlers” and the “natives”.’ This antagonism was entrenched by the British in law and policy and adopted by the Namgyal monarchy who disallowed Nepalis from purchasing land belonging to Bhutia–Lepcha communities.…”
Section: Afterlives Of Imperial Cartographic and Enumeration Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to providing a vital labour force, the ‘pro-British-India-Nepalis’ addressed British anxieties about the pro-Tibetan Sikkimese population (Hiltz, 2003: 71). As Vandenhelsken (2021: 216) notes, ‘the colonial organization of Nepalis in Sikkim was not only driven by economic concerns but also aimed at turning the local Bhutia and Lepcha, whose elites initially opposed colonial rule, into a minority…. Nepali migration in Sikkim was ‘weaponized’ by the colonial administration, setting the ground for reification of antagonistic relations between the “settlers” and the “natives”.’ This antagonism was entrenched by the British in law and policy and adopted by the Namgyal monarchy who disallowed Nepalis from purchasing land belonging to Bhutia–Lepcha communities.…”
Section: Afterlives Of Imperial Cartographic and Enumeration Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The politics of parzapatta became more relevant when the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in the Center announced NRC (National Register of Citizens) in July 2018 and the amendment to the Citizenship Act (CAA) that foregrounded modifications to the principles underlying the definition of the nation and of political membership in India (Vandenhelsken, 2020: 1). Many Gorkhas in neighboring state of Assam were declared as ‘De-voter’ at the first phase and denied their citizenship rights in the NRC (later the Gorkhas in Assam were exempted from NRC).…”
Section: ‘The Third Chapter’: the Beginning Of The End Of The Demand ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The British government administered Manipur from 1891-1907 and later left as a princely state with limited monarchy until the British left in 1947 [25]. Sikkim was an autonomous kingdom in the mid seventeen century until it was incorporated into the Union of India as a distinct state in 1975 [26]. Sharing international borders is a vulnerability and an advantage for trade relationships.…”
Section: International Boundaries and Annexationsmentioning
confidence: 99%