2002
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ancestral loss of the maxillary sinus in Old World monkeys and independent acquisition in Macaca

Abstract: Cercopithecoid monkeys are unique among primates in that all species (except macaques) lack a maxillary sinus, an unusual condition among eutherian mammals. Although this uncommon distribution of cranial pneumatization was noted previously, the phylogenetic ramifications have not been investigated fully. Recently, character state optimization analysis of computed tomography (CT) data from extant Old World monkeys suggested that the loss of the sinus may have occurred at the origin of the group, unlike previous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantages of such a spandrel-like feature are probably varied for different clades. The paranasal sinus is absent from most clades of the Old World monkeys, but the MS re-emerged in the crown lineage of macaques since its ancestral loss from Old World monkeys (Koppe and Ohkawa, 1999;Rae et al, 2002;. Thus, the MS might confer specific functional advantages in macaques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advantages of such a spandrel-like feature are probably varied for different clades. The paranasal sinus is absent from most clades of the Old World monkeys, but the MS re-emerged in the crown lineage of macaques since its ancestral loss from Old World monkeys (Koppe and Ohkawa, 1999;Rae et al, 2002;. Thus, the MS might confer specific functional advantages in macaques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MS pneumatization is always found in macaques and sometimes in baboons and gelada (Papio and Theropithecus), whereas it is absent in other extant Old World monkeys (Koppe and Ohkawa, 1999;. This feature is believed to have arisen independently in these lineages as the paranasal sinuses, including the MS, were lost once in a common ancestor of extant Old World monkeys (Rae et al, 2002). The performance of the air conditioning depends mainly on how the air flows through the nasal cavity (Lindemann et al, 2004;Naftali et al, 2005;Kumahata et al, 2010;Hanida et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings would demonstrate intrageneric variation in the presence or absence of a maxillary sinus in the extinct genus . However, such a variation has not been reported, so far, in extant catarhines [Koppe and Ohkawa, 1999;Rae et al, 2002;Nishimura et al, 2005;Rossie, 2006]. Thus, the morphological discrepancy could reflect an interge-neric diversification and distinct phyletic affiliations of the Senèze and Kuruksay specimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Recently, Nishimura et al [2007,2009] examined the internal architecture of the Kuruksay and Senèze crania to test this issue. Among cercopithecines, the maxillary sinus within the cranium occurs only in the crown species of macaques and is regarded as a derived feature [Rae et al, 2002;Rae and Koppe, 2004;Rae, 2008]. Both species, in adults, had a nasal cavity expanding laterally to make a thin maxillary body at the anterior level of the cheek teeth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maxillary sinus is a paranasal sinus that communicates with the middle meatus of the nasal cavity and pneumatizes the maxilla; this feature is considered to form only in macaques among the extant cercopithecoids including papionins (Koppe and Ohkawa, 1999;Rae et al, 2002;Ito et al, 2009). It is believed that the paranasal sinuses-including the maxillary sinus-were lost in the common ancestor of extant cercopithecoids, and that the maxillary sinus arose again in the crown lineage of macaques (Rae et al, 2002). Thus, such morphological heterogeneities contribute to confusion in arguments about the phylogenetic placement of Procynocephalus and Paradolichopithecus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%