2018
DOI: 10.1080/20780389.2018.1435267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ancestral Characteristics of Modern Populations

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 shows correlations between the traditional law indicators and historical as well as geographical variables. Societies that permit cousin marriage, coded according to the instructions by Rijpma and Carmichael (2016) and using data by Giuliano and Nunn (2018), are more likely to recognize religious law, which is consistent with our second hypothesis. However, this result might be driven by…”
Section: Hypothesessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Table 3 shows correlations between the traditional law indicators and historical as well as geographical variables. Societies that permit cousin marriage, coded according to the instructions by Rijpma and Carmichael (2016) and using data by Giuliano and Nunn (2018), are more likely to recognize religious law, which is consistent with our second hypothesis. However, this result might be driven by…”
Section: Hypothesessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Secondary outcome variable . The political complexity variable is constructed from the ethnographic atlas provided by Giuliano and Nunn [ 53 ]. The variable is v33: jurisdictional hierarchy beyond local community.…”
Section: Theories and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I use the ancestral characteristics of modern populations data [ 53 ] various versions of which have been used extensively in many cross-cultural studies and its credibility has been documented by anthropologists, economists and other social scientists. The data are available here: https://scholar.harvard.edu/nunn/pages/data-0 , https://worldmap.harvard.edu/data/geonode:murdock_ea_2010_3 or https://github.com/sboysel/murdock .…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis thus strengthens the hypothesis that the Church's MFP impacted human psychology through its effect on kinship intensity. 44 (iii) The analysis uses individual-level responses, which allow us to control for individual characteristics. This is particularly relevant for religious denomination.…”
Section: S4 European Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, with intensive kin-based institutions, people's psychological processes adapt to the collectivistic demands and the dense social networks that they interweave (39-43). Intensive kinship norms reward greater conformity, obedience, holistic/relational awareness and in-group loyalty but discourage individualism, independence and analytical thinking (41,44). Since the sociality of intensive kinship is based on people's interpersonal embeddedness, adapting to these institutions tends to reduce people's inclinations towards impartiality, universal (non-relational) moral principles and impersonal trust, fairness and cooperation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%