2022
DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2022.3199594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomy-XNet: An Anatomy Aware Convolutional Neural Network for Thoracic Disease Classification in Chest X-Rays

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The suggested model employs low-complexity feature extraction methods and BFO with multiple CNN approaches, enabling extremely accurate assessment and correlation across a broad spectrum of illness kinds. The proposed model enhanced illness classification and recommendation accuracy by 12.4%, 1.5%, and 5.9% under various use situations compared to ACNN (Kamal et al 2022 ), MGAN (Liu et al 2022 ), and DLV3 (Zhou et al 2022 ), as evaluated using various test samples in Table 2 and Fig. 5 .…”
Section: Comparative Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The suggested model employs low-complexity feature extraction methods and BFO with multiple CNN approaches, enabling extremely accurate assessment and correlation across a broad spectrum of illness kinds. The proposed model enhanced illness classification and recommendation accuracy by 12.4%, 1.5%, and 5.9% under various use situations compared to ACNN (Kamal et al 2022 ), MGAN (Liu et al 2022 ), and DLV3 (Zhou et al 2022 ), as evaluated using various test samples in Table 2 and Fig. 5 .…”
Section: Comparative Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Combining several CNN techniques with multidomain feature representation models enables the suggested model to deliver accurate recommendations. The proposed model improved disease classification and associated recommendation precision by 5.9% when compared to ACNN (Kamal et al 2022 ), 0.5% when compared to MGAN (Liu et al 2022 ), and 6.0% when compared to DLV3 (Zhou et al 2022 ) in a variety of application scenarios, based on the estimated accuracy for various test samples in Table 3 and Fig. 6 .…”
Section: Comparative Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, these methods are data-driven and are generally agnostic to the human anatomy and its dependence on identifying the diseased regions. Chen et al [7] and Kamal et al [8] utilized lung segmentation-based attention mechanisms. However, diseasespecific anatomical prior knowledge was not considered within the attention mechanism and abnormality localization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%