2013
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomy of the Spermatophore in Triatomines (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae) and Its Applications to the Study of Chagas Disease Vector Biology

Abstract: Abstract. The present study focused on spermatophore structure, transfer, and subsequent destination inside bloodfeeding females of the species Triatoma infestans and Rhodnius neglectus. The morphology of the spermatophore differed between the species studied, such that in T. infestans, the shape was ovaloid, whereas in R. neglectus, the shape resembled a rod. Structures' spine-like cuticulars distributed across the inner surface of the vagina of both species were observed; however, the role of these cuticular… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of single-pointed, bifurcated, and trifurcated spines in the median region of gonapophysis 8 in the three species studied, and at the base of gonocoxite 8 in T. jatai , shows the importance of the morphological details detectable by using SEM. These spines are present in the internal genitalia of Rhodnius neglectus (Lent, 1954), and also in the copulatory pouch, indicating that they may assist with spermatophore compression and sperm release [ 25 ]. However, the functions of these spines in copulation or ovulation have not been clarified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of single-pointed, bifurcated, and trifurcated spines in the median region of gonapophysis 8 in the three species studied, and at the base of gonocoxite 8 in T. jatai , shows the importance of the morphological details detectable by using SEM. These spines are present in the internal genitalia of Rhodnius neglectus (Lent, 1954), and also in the copulatory pouch, indicating that they may assist with spermatophore compression and sperm release [ 25 ]. However, the functions of these spines in copulation or ovulation have not been clarified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khalifa [45] described the spermatophore in R. prolixus as a pearshaped sac containing spermatozoa enclosed in a proteinaceous mass, and from his study of fixed tissue, Davey [36] proposed that before it is delivered to the female, this spermatophore is formed within the male spermatophore sac that everts from the end of the aedeagus into the female during copulation. While examining spermatophore formation in Triatoma infestans and Rhodnius neglectus, Pereira-Lourenço et al [23] made observations which differ to that reported for R. prolixus. In these bugs, which are closely related to R. prolixus, there is no spermatophore sac and the spermatophores are transferred as a viscous or mucous substance directly to the vagina where they solidify.…”
Section: Delivery Of Male Secretions To the Vaginamentioning
confidence: 74%
“…When pulled in towards the rear of the animal, these genital sclerites cover the sclerites that surround the opening to the genital chamber. The genital chamber in R. prolixus can be referred to as either the bursa copulatrix [20,21] or the vagina [22,23]. In keeping with its functional role, this chapter refers to the genital chamber as the vagina.…”
Section: Overall Design Of the Adult Abdomenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed that spermatophores differ in size, shape and structure, so they can be considered specific markers for the species (Davey, 1958). Pereira-Lourenço et al (2013) point out that the spermatophore of R. neglectus has a stick shape, while that of T. infestans has an ovoid shape. These forms resemble the spermathecae of these two species, since the spermathecae of R. neglectus are elongated and those of T. infestans are completely oval shaped.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%