Anatomy and Ontogeny of the Mandibular Symphysis in Alligator mississippiensis

Abstract

Crocodylians evolved some of the most characteristic skulls of the animal kingdom with specializations for semiaquatic and ambush lifestyles, resulting in a feeding apparatus capable of tolerating high biomechanical loads and bite forces and a head with a derived sense of trigeminal‐nerve‐mediated touch. The mandibular symphysis accommodates these specializations being both at the end of a biomechanical lever and an antenna for sensation. Little is known about the anatomy of the crocodylian mandibular symphysis, hampering our understanding of form, function, and evolution of the joint in extant and extinct lineages. We explore mandibular symphysis anatomy of an ontogenetic series of Alligator mississippiensis using imaging, histology, and whole mount methods. Complex sutural ligaments emanating about a midline‐fused Meckel's cartilage bridge the symphysis. These tissues organize during days 37–42 of in ovo development. However, interdigitations do not manifest until after hatching. These soft tissues leave a hub and spoke‐like bony morphology of the symphyseal plate, which never fuses. Interdigitation morphology varies within the symphysis suggesting differential loading about the joint. Neurovascular canals extend throughout the mandibles to alveoli, integument, and bone adjacent to the symphysis. These features suggest the Alligator mandibular symphysis offers compliance in an otherwise rigid skull. We hypothesize a fused Meckel's cartilage offers stiffness in hatchling mandibles prior to the development of organized sutural ligaments and mineralized bone while offering a scaffold for somatic growth. The porosity of the dentaries due to neurovascular tissues likely allows transmission of sensory and proprioceptive information from the surroundings and the loaded symphysis. Anat Rec, 302:1696–1708, 2019. © 2019 American Association for Anatomy

Origin of the avian predentary and evidence of a unique form of cranial kinesis in Cretaceous ornithuromorphs

“…However, the rostral-most ends of Meckel's cartilage do not meet nor do they fuse into any type of rostral structure in these species, nor was evidence of fusion ever found in quail and duck embryos or duck hatchlings (35,47). In the American alligator, Meckel's cartilages fuse in the midline and persist through adulthood, but similar to Neornithes, they do not take part in any rostral structure and simply stay embedded within the 2 dermal DEs at the mandibular symphysis (48). A survey of the literature including more remote outgroups (SI Appendix, Table S1) also fails to identify strictly rostral, unpaired structures derived from Meckel's cartilage.…”

“…In extant vertebrates, separate (unfused) DEs at the mandibular symphysis are always linked in their midline by dense connective tissues (35,48,78), but may also involve some symphyseal SC nodules in mammals (79, 80) similar (but not homologous) to those seen in Yanornis. Based on these neontological histological studies, a mixed cartilaginous-fibrous joint is the only possible interpretation for the mandibular symphysis of Yanornis (Fig.…”

Dinosaur paleohistology: review, trends and new avenues of investigation

“…The hypothesis that physical movement may be responsible for secondary cartilage formation has been previously proposed for some cranial joints in both birds and mammals (Murray, 1963; Murray & Drachman, 1969; Bareggi et al, 1994), but the degree and/or direction of such movement has not been quantified. Nevertheless, cranial tissues have great potential for more accurate inferences regarding skull structure and function (e.g., cranial kinesis or akinesis) in non-avian dinosaurs and other fossil archosaurs (e.g., see Bailleul & Holliday, 2017; Lessner et al, 2019).…”

The Natural Historian's Guide to the CT Galaxy: Step-by-Step Instructions for Preparing and Analyzing Computed Tomographic (CT) Data Using Cross-Platform, Open Access Software

“…Pairing CT with other bio-imaging techniques like histology or material testing has great potential in the visualization and interpretation of complex anatomies, as well as making sure digital models (i.e., FEA) are accurately mimicking structural complexity ( Jayasankar et al. 2017 ; Lessner et al. 2019 ; Seidel et al.…”