2000
DOI: 10.1007/s002260000046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomy and lignin distribution of reaction wood in two Magnolia species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
44
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A group of UV studies have concerned tension wood in various hardwood species (Lehringer et al 2008;Ruelle et al 2007;Yoshida et al 2002;Yoshizawa et al 2000) and have shown a decrease in absorbance around 280 nm corresponding to a decrease in lignin content (G units). One study has taken a more intervening experimental approach to UV studies of tension wood (Yoshida et al 2005) by inducing extra gravity to growing secondary xylem of Prunus jamasakura.…”
Section: Uv-vis Spectra Of Lignin and Other Ring Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A group of UV studies have concerned tension wood in various hardwood species (Lehringer et al 2008;Ruelle et al 2007;Yoshida et al 2002;Yoshizawa et al 2000) and have shown a decrease in absorbance around 280 nm corresponding to a decrease in lignin content (G units). One study has taken a more intervening experimental approach to UV studies of tension wood (Yoshida et al 2005) by inducing extra gravity to growing secondary xylem of Prunus jamasakura.…”
Section: Uv-vis Spectra Of Lignin and Other Ring Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In poplar and eucalyptus wood, fibres and vessels were significantly longer with an increase in the proportion of fibres and very thick cell walls (Baba et al 1996, Jourez et al 2001. Although the G-layer is the principal characteristic for determining the presence of tension wood, some studies have showed that the G-layer is absent in the tension wood of several hardwood species (Onaka 1949, Fisher and Stevenson 1981, Yoshizawa et al 2000, Clair et al 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relationship between growth stress and microfibril angle of secondary wall in wood fibers has been reported in reaction wood in angiosperms: the microfibril angle was smaller in the S2 layers of reaction wood fibers compared to that of opposite wood fibers ( [15,[40][41][42]50]. Okuyama et al [15] suggested that microfibril angle is an important factor in the generation of growth stress in tension wood.…”
Section: Microfibril Angle In Tension Wood Fibermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2B, 3B) [33][34][35][36][37][38]. In some species having no G-layer in reaction wood, it has been reported that microfibril angle of S2 layer decreased [15,[39][40][41][42] reported that the microfibril angle of S2 layer was very small (5 to 10 degrees) in reaction wood of Magnolia acuminate and Liriodendron tulipifera. In Magnolia obovata and M. kobus, the innermost surface of S2 layer of fiber tracheid wall also showed a small microfibril angle [41].…”
Section: Microfibril Angle In Tension Wood Fibermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation