2007
DOI: 10.4137/cmo.s367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomopathologic Subtypes of Endometrial Carcinoma: Case-Control Study of 122 Cases. Epidemiology and Ultrasound

Abstract: Objective To determine the epidemiological and sonographic characteristics of patients with endometrial carcinoma of endometrioid and non-endometrioid subtype to analyse if any differences can be observed between the groups. Study design A case-control study was performed considering 122 patients with endometrial carcinoma where 96 (78.69%) had endometrioid carcinomas (controls) and 26 (21.31%) had non-endometrioid carcinomas (cases). Epidemiological, clinical, and sonographic variables (endometrial thicknes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Perez-Medina T, the mean age of patients with non-endometrioid carcinomas was significantly higher than the age in the group with Endometrioid carcinomas. 6 For a few types of cancer, lower socioeconomic status is associated with higher incidence, and for even more cancer types it is associated with having a less favorable tumor stage at diagnosis. For endometrial cancer, however, there is no clear evidence of such associations with socioeconomic status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Perez-Medina T, the mean age of patients with non-endometrioid carcinomas was significantly higher than the age in the group with Endometrioid carcinomas. 6 For a few types of cancer, lower socioeconomic status is associated with higher incidence, and for even more cancer types it is associated with having a less favorable tumor stage at diagnosis. For endometrial cancer, however, there is no clear evidence of such associations with socioeconomic status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%