2016
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000002811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical Studies of the Orbital Cavity Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography

Abstract: This quantitative analysis of orbital measurements will allow surgeons to plan operations more accurately and will help predict outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the coronal slide we chose for measuring the medial orbital wall and floor angle may seem anterior to the true orbital apex, our measuring technique reduces the impact of sphenoid sinus size and location, which occasionally forms the medial wall of the optic canal and is not routinely removed in decompression surgery. Our mean angle value of 133.5°was close to Kang et al's 136.88°which was derived from 276 Asian orbits [22]. It is also similar to the 122°measured by Keast et al in 36 Polynesian and 119°in 144 Caucasians [23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although the coronal slide we chose for measuring the medial orbital wall and floor angle may seem anterior to the true orbital apex, our measuring technique reduces the impact of sphenoid sinus size and location, which occasionally forms the medial wall of the optic canal and is not routinely removed in decompression surgery. Our mean angle value of 133.5°was close to Kang et al's 136.88°which was derived from 276 Asian orbits [22]. It is also similar to the 122°measured by Keast et al in 36 Polynesian and 119°in 144 Caucasians [23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Literature Literature Literature Orbit Volume (cm 3 ) 24.3 [43] � 25.6 [62] � 26.8 [63] 25-28.9 [13,[45][46][47] 27.7 [64] 33.2 [65] 26.8 [49] 27.8 [66] 29.6 [50] 29.2 [64] 23.2 [51] 26.5 [49] 25.6 [66] 25.9 [64] Orbit width 39.7 [67] � 39.8 [52] -41.3 [53] 41.7 [64] 35 [68] 39.8 [54] 41 [69] 42.5 [64] 44.2 [55] 33.6 [68] 36.9 [54] 39 [69] 41 [64] 42.1 [54] Orbit height 2 (Inf-SupM) 33.4 [52] 34.1 [64] 36.2 [67] � 36.6 [45] 32.4 [10] 33.6 [64] 35.9 [56] 36.6 [68] 39 [69] 31.8 [10] 34.1 [64] 35.4 [56] 35.7 [68] 37 [69] Orbit lenght medial 41.3 [61] � [64] 43 [57] 46.9…”
Section: All Groups Male Femalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result implies a high identity of the horizontal axis distance between these 2 modules. Previous studies had focused on the measurement of orbital cavity in 3D CT image 30 . In current study, we estimated the depth with different reference points from optic canal to rim edge closest to the infra-orbital foramen (IOF) because of a better recognized landmark in repair surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%