2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07405-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical restoration of the anterior femoral compartment when performing KATKA: the end of the flush anterior femoral cut dogma!

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports of 3‐D analysis of the difference between the femoral component positioned with unKA and the native trochlea have generally confirmed the present study's findings that a femoral component with a PTA of 6° valgus positioned with unKA does not restore the native trochlea in all patients [14, 15, 22–24]. One explanation, according to a CT analysis of 4116 knees, is that the angle formed by the native trochlear angle (i.e., sulcus) and distal femoral joint line varies widely from 24° varus to 30° valgus, which suggests that existing arthroplasty components and techniques may not replicate the anatomy of morphologic outliers and could lead to dissatisfaction [9, 21, 24, 26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Previous reports of 3‐D analysis of the difference between the femoral component positioned with unKA and the native trochlea have generally confirmed the present study's findings that a femoral component with a PTA of 6° valgus positioned with unKA does not restore the native trochlea in all patients [14, 15, 22–24]. One explanation, according to a CT analysis of 4116 knees, is that the angle formed by the native trochlear angle (i.e., sulcus) and distal femoral joint line varies widely from 24° varus to 30° valgus, which suggests that existing arthroplasty components and techniques may not replicate the anatomy of morphologic outliers and could lead to dissatisfaction [9, 21, 24, 26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%