Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.1002/cne.24169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical organization of the brain of a diurnal and a nocturnal dung beetle

Abstract: To avoid the fierce competition for food, South African ball-rolling dung beetles carve a piece 4 of dung off a dung-pile, shape it into a ball and roll it away along a straight line path. For this 5 unidirectional exit from the busy dung pile, at night and day, the beetles use a wide repertoire 6 of celestial compass cues. This robust and relatively easily measurable orientation behavior has 7 made ball-rolling dung beetles an attractive model organism for the study of the neuroethology 8 behind insect orient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
153
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
14
153
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The posterior boundary is defined by the horizontal crossing of the lateral antennal lobe tract behind the LAL, which defines the plane that separates the LAL from the more posterior regions of the ventromedial protocerebrum. While this border is somewhat arbitrary, it is consistent with the LAL definitions in other species (Heinze & Reppert, 2012;Immonen et al, 2017;Ito et al, 2014). More clearly defined than the LAL, the bulb is wedged between the dorsal LAL margin and the posterio-medial surface of the mushroom body lobes ( Figure 8I-K).…”
Section: Lateral Complexsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The posterior boundary is defined by the horizontal crossing of the lateral antennal lobe tract behind the LAL, which defines the plane that separates the LAL from the more posterior regions of the ventromedial protocerebrum. While this border is somewhat arbitrary, it is consistent with the LAL definitions in other species (Heinze & Reppert, 2012;Immonen et al, 2017;Ito et al, 2014). More clearly defined than the LAL, the bulb is wedged between the dorsal LAL margin and the posterio-medial surface of the mushroom body lobes ( Figure 8I-K).…”
Section: Lateral Complexsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…To this end, we have carried out a combination of immunohistochemical stainings and 3D reconstructions of wholemount and sectioned Bogong moth brains to produce a comprehensive description of all major regions in the brain of this species, similar to those published for example for the Monarch butterfly (Heinze & Reppert, 2012), the dung beetle (Immonen, Dacke, Heinze, & el Jundi, 2017), the fruit fly (Ito et al, 2014;Jenett et al, 2012), and the locust (von Hadeln, Althaus, Häger, & Homberg, 2018). To account for inter-individual variation, we additionally produced a standardised brain atlas, which robustly describes the average shape of the male Bogong moth brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although morphologically similar regions of the brain have been described in other insects (Immonen, Dacke, Heinze, & el Jundi, 2017;von Hadeln, Althaus, Häger, & Homberg, 2018), to our knowledge, little is known about the function of these regions of the brain. Neurons in the central complex of other insects have been shown to respond to mechanosensory stimuli (U.…”
Section: Potential Downstream Targets and Functions Of Wind Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In many insects, these cells carry global compass information derived from the skylight polarization pattern and other celestial cues. This compass-pathway has been most extensively studied in locusts (reviewed in [10,88]), but has also been identified in the Monarch butterfly [86,89], dung beetles [87,90], ants [91], and bees [64]. When presenting a rotating polarizer to the animal from above, polarization sensitive neurons (POL-neurons) of this pathway respond with sinusoidal changes in their action potential frequency [88].…”
Section: The Neural Basis Of Path Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%