2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tria.2020.100105
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical normality and variability: Historical perspective and methodological considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
82
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, at last, we suggest that the FM's anatomic and morphometric evaluation showed a significant difference between various parameters, so further comparative studies were required. Repeated anatomical observations deepen existing knowledge, help overcome the subjective aspect in the description made by individual researchers, and can be useful for practitioners [29]. Round; G. Irregular; H. Egg-shaped.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, at last, we suggest that the FM's anatomic and morphometric evaluation showed a significant difference between various parameters, so further comparative studies were required. Repeated anatomical observations deepen existing knowledge, help overcome the subjective aspect in the description made by individual researchers, and can be useful for practitioners [29]. Round; G. Irregular; H. Egg-shaped.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation found in this case report constitutes an abnormal connection of the sympathetic chain that most likely arose during early embryonic development. While this finding appears to be extremely rare, it nonetheless results in an abnormal pattern of innervation from the lumbar sympathetic chain and could contribute to surgical complications during approaches to the lumbar spine [5,16,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the craniocaudal shift changes were unclear due to the range of variation shown in a typical human lumbar plexus roots, where one additional or reduced thoracolumbar count was considered a typical variation. This issue on anatomical normality and variability have been deeply debated in the long history of anatomy [49]. One additional or reduced thoracolumbar count is often observed within the normal range, so each anatomical normality and variability may not be easy to identify among their overlapping variation based on this concept.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%