1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2353(1997)10:2<104::aid-ca6>3.3.co;2-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical dissection of the deep posterior compartment and its correlation with clinical reports of chronic compartment syndrome involving the deep posterior compartment

Abstract: Patients with clinical presentation of deep posterior chronic compartment syndrome (CCS) frequently have symptoms limited to either proximal or distal components of the deep posterior compartment. In this study the posterior aspect of 15 cadaver legs was dissected to document anatomical separations and delineate boundaries, if any, of the deep posterior compartment and to correlate the findings to these patients. Origins of flexor hallucis longus (FHL), flexor digitorum longus (FDL), and tibialis posterior (TP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is likely because of their localization under the superficial posterior leg compartment ( gastrocnemii and soleus ), and because of interactions between contractile and connective tissue elements. For instance, the posterior deep muscle compartment (FDL, FHL and TP) is composed of thin muscles, close to the main posterior neurovascular bundle (posterior tibial vessels and the tibial nerve) (Kwiatkowski & Detmer, ; Bianchi & Martinoli, ) and underneath the lower limb deep transverse fascia (Benjamin, ). Consequently, the US transducer orientation was adjusted in real time to maintain a longitudinal view of the targeted structure during the motion and US images clear of non‐muscular structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is likely because of their localization under the superficial posterior leg compartment ( gastrocnemii and soleus ), and because of interactions between contractile and connective tissue elements. For instance, the posterior deep muscle compartment (FDL, FHL and TP) is composed of thin muscles, close to the main posterior neurovascular bundle (posterior tibial vessels and the tibial nerve) (Kwiatkowski & Detmer, ; Bianchi & Martinoli, ) and underneath the lower limb deep transverse fascia (Benjamin, ). Consequently, the US transducer orientation was adjusted in real time to maintain a longitudinal view of the targeted structure during the motion and US images clear of non‐muscular structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Some studies have suggested that the significantly higher failure rate associated with release of the deep posterior compartment may be related to variable anatomic features, whereby some patients possess a "fifth compartment" of the lower leg formed by a fibular attachment of the flexor digitorum longus (FDL) muscle. 9,10,19 This osseofascial sheath has the ability to compress segments of the tibialis posterior muscle (TPM), thereby raising pressures and producing the symptoms of exertional compartment syndrome. Figure 1A demonstrates a crosssectional view of the lower leg to highlight the relationships between these structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In den dorsalen Kompartimenten werden sie dagegen seltener beobachtet (6). Sie beruhen dann wahrscheinlich auf der anatomischen Variation von Subkompartments (29). Belastungsabhängige Schmerzen im Bereich der Waden müssen in der Regel anderen Ursachen zugeordnet werden; Melberg und Styf (35) fanden hier bei den betroffenen Leistungssportlern niemals einen erhöhten intrakompartimentären Druck.…”
Section: Chronische Exertionelle Kompartmentsyndromeunclassified
“…In dem Kollektiv mit den 10 venengesunden Probanden lagen die Druckwerte im tiefen Kompartment durchschnittlich bei 13,6 (9-17) mmHg im Liegen und 29 Der Vergleich der präoperativen gegen die postoperativen Kompartmentdrücke im Liegen ergab im Patienten-Kollektiv einen Wert von p = 0,172 und ist nicht signi-fikant. Der Vergleich bei den entsprechenden Messungen im Stehen zeigte mit p = 0,003 eine statistische Signifikanz.…”
Section: Apparative Untersuchungsverfahrenunclassified