2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical and Manometric Comparison of Perineal and Transscrotal Approaches to Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement

Abstract: While the transscrotal approach to artificial urinary sphincter placement has the advantage of technical ease, the anatomical and manometric findings of this cadaver study suggest that the perineal approach offers a more proximal cuff location, more robust urethral size and more effective urethral coaptation than the transscrotal approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cuff was most probably implanted by the easier trans-scrotal approach in our subject, the pump itself being placed in the left sub-dartos pouch via the same approach. While some studies advocated the perineal approach [13], the scrotal approach appeared to be satisfactory in our subject. A significant observation was the location of the balloon anterior to the left lower RA muscle, just under the anterior rectus sheath in our subject.…”
Section: Placement Of Ausmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The cuff was most probably implanted by the easier trans-scrotal approach in our subject, the pump itself being placed in the left sub-dartos pouch via the same approach. While some studies advocated the perineal approach [13], the scrotal approach appeared to be satisfactory in our subject. A significant observation was the location of the balloon anterior to the left lower RA muscle, just under the anterior rectus sheath in our subject.…”
Section: Placement Of Ausmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…These sites can be accessed through the trans-scrotal incision. These balloon placement sites also generate a higher urethral RLPP during cuff inflation, providing better urinary continence because most patients are post-prostatectomy cases afflicted with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) [2,3,12,13]. It is our postulate, which we shall elaborate subsequently, that our subject perhaps did not require high urethral RLPP, which may have explained the balloon placement in his left lower anterior abdominal wall.…”
Section: Placement Of Ausmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, operative time is reduced, and this also allows for easier implantation of concomitant PP placement. However, outcomes with regards to continence rates, device infection or erosion rates are still controversial (17)(18)(19)(20). At this time, we still perform the traditional two-incision approach for AUS placement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%