“…Additionally, genital surgery entails a significant risk of impaired sexual functioning, which has led to a rethinking of gender assignment decisions in newborns and increased conservatism regarding genitalsurgery (Hughesetal.,2006;Meyer-Bahlburg, 2002a;Preves, 1998), a process that is still ongoing. In the course of this debate, numerous outcome studies of genital surgery in individuals with DSDs have been published, which increasingly evaluate not only cosmesis (i.e., quality of the anatomic outcome) but also functional outcome (Crouch et al, 2008;Gastaud et al, 2007;Karkazis, 2008;Minto, Liao, Woodhouse, Ransley, & Creighton, 2003;Sircili et al, 2006). Yet, the surgical techniques utilized are highly variable; theexisting cross-sectionalfollow-upstudies usually involve onlymodestsample sizes ofpatientswithDSDs,often withconsiderable variability in the particular DSD syndromes represented among the subjects as well as in the ages at evaluation; RCT approaches to compare surgical techniques, even for cosmetic outcome, have not been attempted; and the existing follow-up studies commonly do not even attempt to systematically compare different surgical techniques.…”