2022
DOI: 10.25259/sni_404_2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomic variations of the floor of the third ventricle: Surgical implications for endoscopic third ventriculostomy

Abstract: Background: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) is currently used as a treatment for different types of hydrocephalus. However, the anatomical endoscopic variants of the third ventricle floor (3VF), as well as their surgical implications, have been underrated. The anatomic variations of the 3VF can influence the technique and the success rate of the ETV. The purpose of this article is to describe the anatomical variations of 3VF, assess their incidence, and discuss the implications for ETV. Methods: Int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Determining the best operative technique and the individualization of the intervention, a CT and MRI are indispensable for evaluating the ventricular size. Finally, it is essential to remember that the presence of anatomic variations must be identified as they influence the success rate of ETV [ 31 ] as they can result in the loss of the anatomic landmarks and lead to a more technically demanding surgical procedure. The incidence of variations was reported to be 36% in a study of 25 patients, and the success rate dropped 44% in ETV of patients presenting anatomic variations [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining the best operative technique and the individualization of the intervention, a CT and MRI are indispensable for evaluating the ventricular size. Finally, it is essential to remember that the presence of anatomic variations must be identified as they influence the success rate of ETV [ 31 ] as they can result in the loss of the anatomic landmarks and lead to a more technically demanding surgical procedure. The incidence of variations was reported to be 36% in a study of 25 patients, and the success rate dropped 44% in ETV of patients presenting anatomic variations [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%