2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10006-018-0716-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomic evaluation of the incisive canal with cone beam computed tomography and its relevance to surgical procedures in the mental region: a retrospective study in a Brazilian population

Abstract: The mental region of the mandible is considered a safe area to perform surgical procedures such as the placement of osseointegrated implants, orthognathic surgery, and the removal of bone grafts. However, this region includes important neurovascular structures that must be considered or else hemorrhage and neurologic disorders can be experienced.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
10
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The MAR is not considered to be completely free of surgical complications (2,4). To collect a bone graft from the symphysis, a depth of 4 mm must be respected (21); the present study found a mean value of 3.96 mm similar to the value reported by Gomes et al (3.9 mm) (16). When comparing our data with those in previous studies, our findings were smaller than the distance of 4.65 mm reported by Kong et al (10).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The MAR is not considered to be completely free of surgical complications (2,4). To collect a bone graft from the symphysis, a depth of 4 mm must be respected (21); the present study found a mean value of 3.96 mm similar to the value reported by Gomes et al (3.9 mm) (16). When comparing our data with those in previous studies, our findings were smaller than the distance of 4.65 mm reported by Kong et al (10).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Although the genial spinal canal is seldom described in anatomy textbooks, it is doubtless present in almost 100% of cases as confirmed by different investigations (Liang et al, 2006;Birkenfeld et al, 2015;Ferreira Barbosa et al, 2019;Gilis et al, 2019). In the literature, there is some confusion about the nomenclature of this structure in the mandible (He et al, 2017), possibly because there is no defined term for it in the official terminologia anatomica (FIPAT, 2011) In some publications, the term "incisive canal" is used (Serman, 1989;Jacobs et al, 2002;Mraiwa et al, 2003;Raitz et al, 2014;Pereira-Maciel et al, 2015;Ramesh et al, 2015;Gomes et al, 2018;Ferreira Barbosa et al, 2019;Gilis et al, 2019). However, that term refers to the maxillary incisor canal and according to the anatomical nomenclature is incorrect in the context of the mandible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical practice, the most commonly used radiological technique for morphological assessment of the MIC is cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated the presence, size, and position of the MIC on CBCT images [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. However, to our knowledge, no CBCT study has evaluated the presence, size, and distance of the MIC from adjacent anatomical landmarks, and the observer variability of MIC measurements, in the dentate mandibles of Caucasian (Italian) patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%